Far out!
That’s a fish? Looks like an underwater, peyote, horned toad.
Very visually disruptive I must say? Which end is which?
That would look great on a sushi board.
And they know these "leg-lke" apendages have evolved from earlier being like more typical fins -- how? Are there fossils showing the fin changes in so-called frog-fish, or is this just another one of those assumptions that keeps getting into the mix, and is called "science"?
And this from a guy who admits
Years ago, I pointed out to a biologist that what was classified as being "one species" was actually two, but got argued with, up one side, and down the other.
Now the law recognizes that these overlapping populations of very similar deep water fish are two, and have different harvest limits for them, also. But I can tell you, from an informed point of view, the laws concerning them are all but FUBAR. They screwed it up so much, not only from the beginning, but all along the line, that they, the fishery managers don't even know what was harvested. The "numbers" are as much fiction as truth. (one species got counted as another, for a very long time...even after the regs were implemented, since the regs themselves were bass-akwards concerning the proportional numbers of each species in respect to the other, and the fisherman could get away with pushing one kind across the dock as the other --- it FURTHER re-inforced the errors!)
Now, the "numbers they go by" are written in stone, but it's still FUBAR! Scientists, oh how I love them. Why do they so often have to be such over-educated dumbasses???
FIRST PHOTOS: Fish With Transparent Head, “Barrel” Eyes
nationalgeographic | February 23, 2009
Posted on 02/23/2009 6:52:47 PM PST by JoeProBono
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2192507/posts