Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/24/2009 9:49:40 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Far out!


2 posted on 02/24/2009 9:53:12 PM PST by Blogger (Christians- Remember Nineveh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

That’s a fish? Looks like an underwater, peyote, horned toad.


3 posted on 02/24/2009 9:54:49 PM PST by flowerplough (The new Pelosi/Obama Era operating procedure: business as usual with three extra zeros on the end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

4 posted on 02/24/2009 10:03:30 PM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Very visually disruptive I must say? Which end is which?


5 posted on 02/24/2009 10:05:31 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

That would look great on a sushi board.


6 posted on 02/24/2009 10:10:16 PM PST by MaxMax (I'll welcome death when God calls me. Until then, the fight is on)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

And they know these "leg-lke" apendages have evolved from earlier being like more typical fins -- how? Are there fossils showing the fin changes in so-called frog-fish, or is this just another one of those assumptions that keeps getting into the mix, and is called "science"?

And this from a guy who admits

even though the folks that shipped the samples to him informed him they were different, and notably "unusual", but since they were faded out, he assumed (ok, i'm guessing here) they didn't know what they were talking about --- even though it was coming from a U.S. based municipal Aquarium??? Ha. Sounds a lot like some of the marine biologists I've dealt with. They seem to assume that no knows anything much, other than themselves...

Years ago, I pointed out to a biologist that what was classified as being "one species" was actually two, but got argued with, up one side, and down the other.

Now the law recognizes that these overlapping populations of very similar deep water fish are two, and have different harvest limits for them, also. But I can tell you, from an informed point of view, the laws concerning them are all but FUBAR. They screwed it up so much, not only from the beginning, but all along the line, that they, the fishery managers don't even know what was harvested. The "numbers" are as much fiction as truth. (one species got counted as another, for a very long time...even after the regs were implemented, since the regs themselves were bass-akwards concerning the proportional numbers of each species in respect to the other, and the fisherman could get away with pushing one kind across the dock as the other --- it FURTHER re-inforced the errors!)

Now, the "numbers they go by" are written in stone, but it's still FUBAR! Scientists, oh how I love them. Why do they so often have to be such over-educated dumbasses???

10 posted on 02/24/2009 10:46:24 PM PST by BlueDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

FIRST PHOTOS: Fish With Transparent Head, “Barrel” Eyes
nationalgeographic | February 23, 2009
Posted on 02/23/2009 6:52:47 PM PST by JoeProBono
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2192507/posts


13 posted on 02/25/2009 4:17:45 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson