Posted on 02/15/2009 10:47:17 AM PST by season_bug
We can be our own Democrat or Republican if we want to. What we do not want are Liberals or Democrats that make lies sound truthful and murder out of want respectable.
To bullyrag immigrants undocumented or not is tantamount to committing murder.
I owe it to Felimar Blanco, a website master in his own right, for sending over this anti-immigration video for my comment. This is where I do not want to be a Republican pinhead that thinks like a Skinhead or a Supremacist that bullyrags immigrants whether undocumented or not.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7WJeqxuOfQ
You may find my view on this matter quite different if not surprisingly rare.
What is seen in the video is misleading. Control of fertility rate, re, replacement growth was applied on the pre-immigration population [the green graph] but not on the additional population through immigration [the red graph placed on top of the green graph] which shows a camouflaged bias.
Statistical manipulation of this kind cannot escape the notice of one who was once a statistician in the RP bureau of census many years ago. Statistics never lies, unless you put something into it to make it lie.
The presentation was based on the wrong premise that America’s immigration policy aims at helping the underdeveloped countries lessen their population explosion problem! Pebbles in the glass jar have no relevance at all as to why this country attracts different peoples from all parts of the world.
Many Americans had forgotten what the meaning of the Statue of Liberty is – we are welcoming people of the world that seek freedom -- it is not about helping countries where they come from get rid of or lessen their overcrowding population!
This is a huge fundamental error in the understanding of the objectives and goals of the U.S. Immigration policy. It is a subtle distortion of statistical results out of a skillful manipulation of data indicating that immigration is being politicized.
We will have more cost to bear than just spending for our social capital infrastructures for this nation’s immigrants. But the cost of de-immigration outweighs the cost of policing our borders and legalizing those who are already here that had become integral members of our democratic but demographically porous society, as well as the continuing funding of our welfare programs that had been existing in this country since time immemorial … that means even before today’s pinheads began to solve this immigration problem the Orwellian way where immigrants get killed because they want to stop immigration. http://www.afroarticles.com/article-dashboard/Article/Immigrant-Hatred-Kills--The-Real-Problem----Ileto-Murdered-For-Taking--American--Jobs/189
Similar to Shakespeare’s blood and blade characters in Macbeth, Orwell is an active accomplice of treason and tyranny. He is the philosophical god of politically correct politicians that make lies sound truthful and murder respectable. We must address this immigration anathema the American way, not the Orwellian way.
We must accept reality. The naturalization process is not free, and we have to capitalize our expenditures as part of the cost of our social infrastructure.
But to some extent, what we owe for funding those who need to be naturalized, is self-liquidating. For instance, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) earn as much as, if not more than, what it is spending. But intolerant minds in agony are too limited to realize the importance of these ramifications, and blinded by anger and frustrations cannot see a more humane solution. Kicking the bucket until the ankle hurts does not give us the answer, which we need, more than just what we want.
In so far as this anti-immigration video is concerned, it is just an old bullyrag. It exhibits a terrible amnesia of what America – the country of immigrants -- is all about. #
Full story is in "The Light To Share" at http://www.edwinsumcad.blogspot.com/
© Copyright Edwin A. Sumcad. Access The Light To Share February 15, 2009.
The writer is an award-winning journalist. Know more about the author by reading his published editorials and feature articles or you may e-mail your comment at ed.superx722@yahoo.com.sg
We love Third World immigrants they are warm, rich, deep, they have proper relations with their families, they are kind to their dog. They invented everything that makes civilized life worth living. They will be just the same in their home countries and they should return there. The USA is not going to be a Third World hell hole!
If I can’t bullyrag, can I at least hornswoggle?
You know, almost none of this makes sense, there seems to be something missing in each sentence, i.e.:
“We can be our own Democrat or Republican if we want to. What we do not want are Liberals or Democrats that make lies sound truthful and murder out of want respectable.”
“But the cost of de-immigration outweighs the cost of policing our borders and legalizing those who are already here that had become integral members of our democratic but demographically porous society, as well as the continuing funding of our welfare programs that had been existing in this country since time immemorial … that means even before today’s pinheads began to solve this immigration problem the Orwellian way where immigrants get killed because they want to stop immigration.”
Still, I believe what you are trying to say is that we should close the door on future parasites but learn to live with the ones eating away at us now.?
From your About Me page:
“This writer is a veteran diplomat-journalist for more than 45 years and a recipient of excellence awards in journalism. He is a former Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations; he is also an economist, a lawyer and an ASEAN specialist on fiscal policy and regional industrial cooperation. His editorial insights appear in other publications and published in several websites.”
I’m at a loss to reconcile this with what you wrote at the top of this thread.
This does help, from an earlier thread:
“If you studied Literature which include poetry and prose among other things as well as editorial writing in Development Journalism — all offerings of knowledge in the academe — you will find the answers to your questions.
The first thing you will know is that writing style is like a fingerprint that only identifies a particular writer.
The second thing you will know is that Shakespeare is a famous violators of the rules of grammar.
By the way, in the school of literary discipline where I have taught writers to become journalists, you will learn which rules of grammar can be at play. The grammar you have learned in school, may be identifiable from others. For instance, if you can apply the rules of grammar used in creating/writing the greatest literature in the world — the Holy Bible — you will know that the language and syntax are stilted and unwieldy in structure, lacking in clarity ... your own words. Boris Pasternak, one of Russia’s great litterateurs has this identifiable style.
If you are a writer, I bit you have your own fingerprint in writing. The Holy Bible can only be written with such a peculiar style. You do not read the Bible and understand it, like the way you do a news report in The Washington Post. I have my own style too. Different styles in editorial writings, more so in Development Journalism, can win you awards, like I have received in more than 45 years of writings. It depends on how unique it is when it drives home a point from out of the thoughts you wish to convey. If like Shakespeare you have to violate conventional grammar in doing it, don’t hesitate to do it before you lost that thought in lingual niceties. If you can move your readers that way, then you have a great potential.”
Do you get weekend release?
Ping sans comment...
Come and kick us out a$$hole. Bring your gun. I will not put up with that kind of horsesh!t. I will not take that kind of crap about my ancestors, relatives and folks I served in the Army with.
Kill them by starvation and refusal of medical care!
Either get the hell out of the country or don’t come to start with!
I and a large portion of my family fit your definition of third world parasite. You had best well get rid of us now if our being gooks, spicks, et al. is what matters to you. One of us doesn't belong on a conservative forum. I believe you would be more comfortable with Jared Taylor's site or Bimlow's site. Or, if the FR powers prefer, kick me off!
That’s why I pinged w/o comment...I didn’t want to say something that would get me banned!
2010.
Why aren’t you replying to anyone?
I’ll be waiting for you.
Tantamount to committing murder? OK.
But to NOT bullyrag some undocumented "immigrants" IS ACTUAL MURDER -- daily!
What are we? No better than potted plants in Sumcad's eyes? Mr. Sumcad. He's some cad all right. He started the name calling.
We must accept reality. The naturalization process is not free
Right again! The criminals among the precious ILLEGAL immigrants have cost thousands of lives -- we have enough murderers among our citizens and legal residents. WE DO NOT NEED MORE!
a terrible amnesia of what America – the country of immigrants -- is all about
I went to school in America long, long ago. In those days America was a Nation of laws not men -- stop ignoring the law, then change the law if the Nation wishes, then open the gates wide to all! It ain't rocket science.
Because he's a troll trying to elicit a reaction.
The disjointed, inchoate diatribe he posted is typical trash from witless leftists like him. He posts it here because he's hoping to get some juicy posts to link to on DU or DailyKos or similar.
That's all. Just a jerk.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.