Skip to comments.
Sen. Gregg Withdraws Nomination as Sec. Commerce
foxnews.com
| 2/12/2009
| staff
Posted on 02/12/2009 1:59:41 PM PST by kellynla
Sen. Gregg withdraws nomination as Sec. Commerce
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: gregg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: iceskater
21
posted on
02/12/2009 2:06:46 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: iceskater
Its an indication of the direction the wind is blowing, if nothing else.
22
posted on
02/12/2009 2:06:55 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: iceskater
23
posted on
02/12/2009 2:07:09 PM PST
by
maxter
(Give today a chance. Enjoy.)
To: Doogle
How about rarely?? Or occasional?
I’m ready to break out some tar and feathers.
24
posted on
02/12/2009 2:07:40 PM PST
by
iceskater
(Just say NO to porkulus!)
To: kellynla
THANKS!!!!!!!!!!!! for printing this!!
I was looking for a thread about this!
25
posted on
02/12/2009 2:07:54 PM PST
by
Guenevere
("He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain that which he cannot lose")
To: kellynla
I bet its because that bum Obama pulled a bait and switch. Right after accepting, it was suddenly decided that the Department of the Census would no longer fall under Commerce.
Shrewd move by the Dems. Put that scarce Republican seat into play in 2010. Its not at all certain that Gregg would have won, but incumbents do enjoy a huge advantage. So they pluck him out, and then diminish the job.
My theory is that they do that to their political opponents. Like Hillary, in her diminishing role. She is invisible.
26
posted on
02/12/2009 2:07:59 PM PST
by
dashing doofus
(Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
To: kellynla
I saw it at least three times before.
27
posted on
02/12/2009 2:08:16 PM PST
by
murron
(Proud Marine Mom)
To: maxter
I’m not sure I buy that since he voted for Geithner.
28
posted on
02/12/2009 2:08:19 PM PST
by
iceskater
(Just say NO to porkulus!)
To: iceskater
The administration is corrupt and he can’t stomach it.
29
posted on
02/12/2009 2:08:54 PM PST
by
boomop1
To: iceskater; Shermy
>>Any reason why?
Well, based on past resignations, Judd didn’t pay taxes on his nanny or gardners.....
30
posted on
02/12/2009 2:08:57 PM PST
by
swarthyguy
("We may be crazy in Pakistan, but not completely out of our minds," ISI Gen. Ahmed Shujaa Pasha)
To: murron
Then why bother to come on this thread....sheesh
31
posted on
02/12/2009 2:09:30 PM PST
by
Guenevere
("He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain that which he cannot lose")
To: iceskater
I’m ready to break out some tar and feathers.buy stock in them
32
posted on
02/12/2009 2:09:33 PM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: kellynla
So, does this mean he’s not a RINO POS TRAITOR anymore?
33
posted on
02/12/2009 2:09:45 PM PST
by
Cedric
To: swarthyguy
That I might believe.
34
posted on
02/12/2009 2:09:55 PM PST
by
iceskater
(Just say NO to porkulus!)
To: kellynla
Reason: I finally figured out that Obama is a Marxist and it would go against every thing I say I believe in to support his destruction of American capitalism”..
P.S. I was being set up as a scapegoat too.... No doubt typical whitey...
35
posted on
02/12/2009 2:10:07 PM PST
by
tomnbeverly
(Taxpayers doing time on the Obama Plantation.)
To: kellynla
Watch the libs try to dig up tax issues on him.
To: Doogle
Since I’ve lost a ton in the Obama Dow Debacle, that might be the only stocks that will see their share price increase in the next few years.
37
posted on
02/12/2009 2:10:52 PM PST
by
iceskater
(Just say NO to porkulus!)
To: kellynla
Finally, a Washington politician with some integrity. I have respect for him in that he allowed his principles to guide him and did not become part of the Obama sleaze. Let the other honest men show integrity too. Leave Obama with his collection of tax cheats, sleazy lobbyists and those who sell pardons to drug dealers and terrorists.
To: kellynla
Why bother to have anyone in his administration - he’ll rule by executive fiat anyway ....
39
posted on
02/12/2009 2:11:08 PM PST
by
SkyDancer
("Talent Without Ambition Is Sad, Ambition Without Talent Is Worse")
To: kellynla
40
posted on
02/12/2009 2:11:30 PM PST
by
Road Warrior ‘04
(I'll miss President Bush greatly! Palin in 2012!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson