Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coast Guard asks boaters, pilots to use digital frequencies; will no longer respond to analog
Newsday ^ | January 21, 2009 | staff reporter

Posted on 01/22/2009 3:16:29 AM PST by Daffynition

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico (AP) — The U.S. Coast Guard says it will no longer respond to distress calls sent by analog signal starting Feb. 1.

The agency is switching to digital frequencies and says the new equipment cannot process signals transmitting on 121.5 or 243.0 MHz.

The Coast Guard said Wednesday in a statement that the switch to digital will provide a more stable and powerful signal that could improve response times.

The agency said mariners and aviators should upgrade their equipment to include a digital 406-MHz distress radio beacon and register it [snip]

(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Military/Veterans; Outdoors; Travel
KEYWORDS: analog; rescue; technology; uscg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: JoeProBono

Oh man! I want one of those!


21 posted on 01/22/2009 4:45:04 AM PST by gridlock (QUESTION AUTHORITY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
Digital? Ain't nuthin' like original vinyl.


22 posted on 01/22/2009 4:50:58 AM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: raybbr
They've been talking about this for almost a decade now.

February 1, 2009: The Phaseout of 121.5 MHz Beaconsfor Satellite Distress Alerting

 

 

February 1, 2009: The Phaseout of 121.5 MHz Beacons

for Satellite Distress Alerting

 

In October 2000 the International Cospas-Sarsat Program, announced at its 25th Council Session held in London, UK that it plans to terminate satellite processing of distress signals from 121.5 and 243 MHz emergency beacons on February 1, 2009. All mariners, aviators, and individuals using emergency beacons on those frequencies will need to switch to those operating on the newer, more reliable, digital

406 MHz frequency if they want to be detected by satellites.

 

The decision to stop satellite processing of 121.5 / 243 MHz signals is due to problems in this frequency band which inundate search and rescue authorities with poor accuracy and numerous false alerts, adversely impacting the effectiveness of lifesaving services. Although the 406 MHz beacons cost more at the moment, they provide search and rescue agencies with more reliable and complete information to do their job more efficiently and effectively. The Cospas-Sarsat Program made the decision to terminate 121.5/243 MHz satellite alerting services, in part, in response to guidance from the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). These two agencies of the United Nations are responsible for regulating the safety on international transits of ships and aircraft, respectively, and handling international standards and plans for maritime and aviation search and rescue. More than 180 nations are members of IMO and ICAO.

 

NOAA, along with the U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Air Force, and NASA (the four Federal Agencies who manage, operate, and use the SARSAT system) are strongly advising users of 121.5/243 MHz beacons to make the switch to 406. Meanwhile, anyone planning to buy a new distress beacon may wish to take the Cospas-Sarsat decision into account.

 

 

 

Find Out More!

 

 

  • Want to see how much better 406 MHz beacons are compared to the older, less accurate, and less reliable 121.5 MHz beacons are? Click here to see the comparison.

 

  • Read the Official U.S. Department of Commerce / NOAA Press Release announcing the Phaseout of 121.5 / 243 MHz beacons for satellite alerting.

 

  • Read the Official Notice to the public published in the U.S. Federal Register about the Phaseout of 121.5 / 243 MHz beacons for satellite alerting.

 

 

 

SARSAT Banner

 

 

23 posted on 01/22/2009 5:05:54 AM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Thrownatbirth

VHF channel 16 will still be monitored .


24 posted on 01/22/2009 5:12:16 AM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: prisoner6

I’d be very interested to read that if you can find the source.


25 posted on 01/22/2009 5:14:12 AM PST by nicola_tesla (www.fedupusa.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

26 posted on 01/22/2009 5:16:03 AM PST by JoeProBono ("Creative License. Take as much as you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: nicola_tesla
I'll have to dig around. It was a news story from the fall so give me some time. I'll get back to you.

prisoner6

27 posted on 01/22/2009 5:29:17 AM PST by prisoner6 (Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Boaters: "HELP!"

USCG: "Sorry, that's analog. We only do digital."

28 posted on 01/22/2009 7:51:04 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Do I get the boat too?


29 posted on 01/22/2009 8:14:31 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mosaicwolf

Yeah. Tell that to Steve Fossett.


30 posted on 01/22/2009 12:41:23 PM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Vinyl? Leather is better.
31 posted on 01/22/2009 12:48:58 PM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind
Sure. Including the monogrammed linens.


32 posted on 01/22/2009 12:56:27 PM PST by Daffynition ("Beauty is in the sty of the beholder." ~ Joe 6-pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson