[ETL]

Curious post, considering that Walter Duranty did not write any of these articles. You seem like a big hammer who can't find a nail, so you just pound away on bare boards! You must like the sounds of work, more than achieving any particular results, right?

You idiot. Your article was about the freaking New York Slimes (with the traitorous dems) covering for our enemies way back when. Obviously the story of Walter Duranty needs to be included on such a thread. You know, "a little historical perspective" as your tagline promises. In this case, some historical perspective of the NY Slimes and the Rat dems who they defend. Seems you're incapable of putting two and two together. I'll avoid your threads in the future if I can help it.

BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)

[Homer_J_Simpson]

You idiot. Your article was about the freaking New York Slimes (with the traitorous dems) covering for our enemies way back when. Obviously the story of Walter Duranty needs to be included on such a thread.

BroJoeK did not post this article. I did. If you can't be civil please take a hike. I have posted hundreds of articles from the New York Times over the last year. It would be tedious if every one of them turned into a diatribe against Duranty. The article is not about the Times, it is in the Times.

So what is your take on the situation in China in January 1939?