Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Homer_J_Simpson
"[Since March 1, 1933] the army has been increased from an enlisted strength of 116,000 men to 165,000 . . ."

Oh, and by the way... did anyone else notice that not once in this whole article does the word "tank" appear?

Do you suppose that our military planners might be overlooking something?

10 posted on 12/12/2008 3:38:44 PM PST by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK
Oh, and by the way... did anyone else notice that not once in this whole article does the word "tank" appear?

The shopping list in the sidebar story includes: Aircraft, artillery (155 mm and 8-in howitzer), bombsights, canisters for gas masks, gas masks for horses, gas masks for civilians, AA searchlights, anti-tank guns, bombs, and fuses. No tanks.

I read an Eisenhower biography recently and learned that he and Patton, as junior officers, once disassembled an entire tank to see what made it tick. If I remember right they were interested in the use of armored force but were not encouraged by the higher brass.

11 posted on 12/12/2008 3:56:24 PM PST by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson