Posted on 11/26/2008 5:29:54 PM PST by jazusamo
A federal judge this week gave the go-ahead to kill sea lions feasting on salmon at Bonneville Dam, but a Washington state fishery manager said Wednesday that managers will continue to try to trap and relocate the animals first.
U.S. District Judge Michael Mosman on Tuesday ruled against the Humane Society of the United States, which sued to block the lethal-take permit issued to state fishery managers earlier this year by the National Marine Fisheries Service. The states want to kill nuisance sea lions that have in recent years taken advantage of a man-made bottleneck to devour imperiled salmon.
Were disappointed and planning to appeal, said Sharon Young, the organizations marine issues director.
In the meantime, state fishery managers plan to continue last springs trap-and-haul program beginning in March. Oregon and Washington fishing managers established live traps to capture nuisance sea lions identified by brands on their hides, although that program was suspended in early May after six animals died of heat stroke.
State officials will continue to contact zoos and aquariums willing to take nuisance animals, said Guy Norman, regional director of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife in Vancouver.
We would plan to take off where we left off, which is focus on the relocation efforts initially, Norman said. We did have room for 19 animals last year. We filled six of those (slots), and were hoping those vacancies would still remain.
Judge Mosmans ruling is the latest wrinkle in a long-running saga.
The fisheries service granted a request by Washington, Oregon and Idaho to lethally remove nuisance animals congregating in front of the dam. Three years of intensive springtime hazing failed to dissuade sea lions, which gathered by the dozen in front of the dam.
The lethal-take permit enables states to kill as many as 85 sea lions a year.
State and federal biologists estimate California sea lions ate about 3,900 fish at the dam in 2007, which amounts to about 4.2 percent of all the fish that arrived at the dam from January to the end of May. During the same period this year, the Army Corps of Engineers, which operates the dam, observed 4,230 salmon and steelhead eaten by almost 100 sea lions about 2.8 percent of a larger overall run.
Among the Humane Societys arguments, it contends those numbers are too low to meet the threshold under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which allows the killing of nuisance sea lions only if theyre having a significant adverse effect on endangered salmon. By comparison, the Humane Society argued, state fishery managers allow human fishermen to incidentally kill as much as 12 percent of imperiled wild fish.
However, federal officials assert that the sea lions actual kill rate probably is higher than what observers can see.
Mosman agreed. He cited a calculation by federal managers that the rate of predation at Bonneville Dam in 2007 could have been as high as 12.6 percent of spring chinook salmon and 22.1 percent of steelhead.
Further, Mosman noted that states have curtailed fishing substantially in recent years to protect imperiled wild salmon stocks.
In contrast ... pinniped predation is growing, and the states have not been able to control or regulate it, the judge wrote.
A sea lion eats a salmon before trapping operations in April. (Columbian files)
After Jan 20th this would never happen.
The judge finally made a decision but I believe it’s likely the HSUS will appeal again.
I think you’re right and don’t believe this will stand.
A bit of good news. Of course any sea lion fatality will have the obligatory funeral procession in downtown Portland.
You bet and the AR whack jobs must be going nuts.
That’s hilarious! :)
Stole it right here on FR!
I am so sick of the HS. This program should have continued last spring to save endangered fish. I am sick of the cuddle factor determining what species survive. Last springs accusation of these beasts being shot was false and the HS negotiated to close the trapping for the year anyway. They should think of interesting ways of using these huge beasts like feeding the Polar Bears and other predators at the zoo. I would love to see that.
...........but only the Salmon can kill them.
You nailed it when you said the cuddle factor.
States have Fish and Wildlife Depts with high paid wildlife managers working for them, they should be making these type decisions and not AR whack jobs and judges.
7 Things You Didn’t Know About HSUS
1) The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) is a humane society in name only, since it doesnt operate a single pet shelter or pet adoption facility anywhere in the United States. During 2006, HSUS contributed only 4.2 percent of its budget to organizations that operate hands-on dog and cat shelters. In reality, HSUS is a wealthy animal-rights lobbying organization (the largest and richest on earth) that agitates for the same goals as PETA and other radical groups.
2) Beginning on the day of NFL quarterback Michael Vicks 2007 dogfighting indictment, HSUS raised money online with the false promise that it would care for the dogs seized in the Michael Vick case. The New York Times later reported that HSUS wasnt caring for Vicks dogs at all. And HSUS president Wayne Pacelle told the Times that his group recommended that government officials put down (that is, kill) the dogs rather than adopt them out to suitable homes. HSUS later quietly altered its Internet fundraising pitch.
3) HSUSs senior management includes a former spokesman for the Animal Liberation Front (ALF), a criminal group designated as terrorists by the FBI. HSUS president Wayne Pacelle hired John J.P. Goodwin in 1997, the same year Goodwin described himself as spokesperson for the ALF while he fielded media calls in the wake of an ALF arson attack at a California veal processing plant. In 1997, when asked by reporters for a reaction to an ALF arson fire at a farmers feed co-op in Utah (which nearly killed a family sleeping on the premises), Goodwin replied, Were ecstatic. That same year, Goodwin was arrested at a UC Davis protest celebrating the 10-year anniversary of an ALF arson at the university that caused $5 million in damage. And in 1998, Goodwin described himself publicly as a former member of ALF.
4) According to a 2008 Los Angeles Times investigation, less than 12 percent of money raised for HSUS by California telemarketers actually ends up in HSUSs bank account. The rest is kept by professional fundraisers. And if you exclude two campaigns run for HSUS by the Build-a-Bear Workshop retail chain, which consisted of the sale of surplus stuffed animals (not really fundraising), HSUSs yield number shrinks to just 3 percent. Sadly, this appears typical. In 2004, HSUS ran a telemarketing campaign in Connecticut with fundraisers who promised to return a minimum of zero percent of the proceeds. The campaign raised over $1.4 million. Not only did absolutely none of that money go to HSUS, but the group paid $175,000 for the telemarketing work.
5) Research shows that HSUSs heavily promoted U.S. boycott of Canadian seafoodannounced in 2005 as a protest against Canadas annual seal huntis a phony exercise in media manipulation. A 2006 investigation found that 78 percent of the restaurants and seafood distributors described by HSUS as boycotters werent participating at all. Nearly two-thirds of them told surveyors they were completely unaware HSUS was using their names in connection with an international boycott campaign. Canadas federal government is on record about this deception, saying: Some animal rights groups have been misleading the public for years its no surprise at all that the richest of them would mislead the public with a phony seafood boycott.
6) HSUS raised a reported $34 million in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, supposedly to help reunite lost pets with their owners. But comparatively little of that money was spent for its intended purpose. Louisianas Attorney General shuttered his 18-month-long investigation into where most of these millions went, shortly after HSUS announced its plan to contribute $600,000 toward the construction of an animal shelter on the grounds of a state prison. Public disclosures of the disposition of the $34 million in Katrina-related donations add up to less than $7 million.
7) After gathering undercover video footage of improper animal handling at a Chino, CA slaughterhouse during November of 2007, HSUS sat on its video evidence for three months, even refusing to share it with the U.S. Department of Agriculture. HSUSs Dr. Michael Greger testified before Congress that the San Bernardino County (CA) District Attorneys office asked the group to hold on to the information while they completed their investigation. But the District Attorneys office quickly denied that account, even declaring that HSUS refused to make its undercover spy available to investigators if the USDA were present at those meetings. Ultimately, HSUS chose to release its video footage at a more politically opportune time, as it prepared to launch a livestock-related ballot campaign in California. Meanwhile, meat from the slaughterhouse continued to flow into the U.S. food supply for months.
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/article_detail.cfm/article/184
Added to vocabulary, thanks!
The Washington state fishery manager ( from PETA ) believes that catch and release works.
It does NOT.
You’re exactly right. Everyone knows it doesn’t work because of the sea lions that return every year that they’ve previously branded.
![]() |
Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.
Say WA? Evergreen State ping
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this ping list.
Ping sionnsar if you see a Washington state related thread.
Thank you both for pinging your lists. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.