Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

If you want to be added to or deleted from the "Real Time +/- 70 Years" ping list, send me a freepmail.
1 posted on 11/18/2008 12:53:46 PM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fredhead; r9etb; PzLdr; dfwgator; Paisan; From many - one.; rockinqsranch; GRRRRR; 2banana; ...
Mr. Churchill sees this as no time for free markets. Regarding the third short story: The press is working hard to keep their readers apprised of Nazi depredations. I have not seen any articles giving levels or the breakdown of persecution of racial or religious minorities in the Soviet Union..

On this day the German ambassador in Washington, Hans Dieckhoff, was recalled to Berlin and never returned.

2 posted on 11/18/2008 12:56:16 PM PST by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Ironically, Ernst vom Rath, the diplomat shot and killed by Herschel Grynszpan, was the only staffer at the embassy who was under suspicion by the Gestapo for disloyalty to Hitler.


4 posted on 11/18/2008 1:17:42 PM PST by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

These are very interesting. Continued thanks.


7 posted on 11/18/2008 4:53:21 PM PST by snippy_about_it (The FReeper Foxhole. America's history, America's soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fredhead; r9etb; PzLdr; dfwgator; Paisan; From many - one.; rockinqsranch; GRRRRR; 2banana; ...
. . . [On] November 19 [Polish Foreign Minister Beck had] an interview with Ribbentrop – the Nazis obviously wanted the Poles to consider well their response [to the question of returning Danzig to the Reich]. It was negative. As a gesture of understanding, Poland was willing to replace the League of Nations’ guarantee of Danzig with a German-Polish agreement about the status of the Free City.

“Any other solution,” Beck wrote in a memorandum which Lipski read to Ribbentrop, “and in particular any attempt to incorporate the Free City into the Reich, must inevitably lead to conflict.” And he added that Marshal Pilsudski, the late dictator of Poland, had warned the Germans in 1934, during the negotiations for a nonaggression pact, that “the Danzig question was a sure criterion for estimating Germany’s intentions toward Poland.”

Such a reply was not to Ribbentrop’s taste. “He regretted the position taken by Beck” and advised the Poles that it was “worth the trouble to give serious consideration to the German proposals.”

William L. Shirer, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, pp. 455-456

10 posted on 11/19/2008 4:58:58 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson ("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Alas poor Chamberlain. Tis a pity that you will not see the light until next March.


12 posted on 11/19/2008 9:05:46 AM PST by CougarGA7 (Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
Meanwhile there was just some small chat from the Japanese, but you can see in the memorandum that their priority is protecting the acquisition of raw materials which will come into play a few years from now.

The Japanese Foreign Minister admitted that Japan would not support the open door in China. "Mr. Arita went on to say that there prevails a widespread feeling that the Japanese Government has now adopted a new policy–one of closing the open door in China. There had in fact, been no change in policy. His several predecessors had on several occasions given assurances to the American, British, and other representatives in Tokyo that Japan would respect the principle of the open door. As a matter of fact, those assurances were not intended to be unconditional, for the reason that the time had passed when Japan could give an unqualified undertaking to respect the open door in China. He was not implying that his predecessors had given the assur­ances in bad faith: on the contrary he felt certain that they were acting in the best of faith, but what they were attempting to do was to reconcile the principle of the open door with Japan's actual needs and objectives, and that could not be done. As had been previously explained, those objectives are to provide Japan with a market secure against any possible threat of economic sanctions and to acquire safe sources of necessary raw materials; but within those limits Japan was prepared to guarantee equality of opportunity. There would be given full consideration to those enterprises conducted by foreigners other than Japanese which would in no way conflict with or obstruct the carrying out of these primary objectives, and with respect to those enterprises, whether industrial, commercial, or financial, the Japanese Government was fully prepared to give unqualified guarantees. But with regard to other undertakings which overlapped the Japanese economic defence plans, it was no longer possible for Japan to extend any such guarantee." (Memorandum of conversation with Foreign Minister Arita by the Counselor of the American Embassy in Tokyo, Dooman. Japan, Vol. I, p. 801.)

13 posted on 11/19/2008 9:14:41 AM PST by CougarGA7 (Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson