Posted on 11/10/2008 5:50:16 AM PST by Soliton
The evolution of novel characteristics within organisms can be enhanced when environments change in a systematic manner, according to a new study by Weizmann Institute researchers.
Merav Parter, Nadav Kashtan and Uri Alon suggest that in environments that vary over time in a non-random way, evolution can learn the rules of the environment and develop organisms that can readily generate novel useful traits with only a few mutations. Details are published November 7 in the open-access journal PLoS Computational Biology
In this study Parter, Kashtan and Alon began with the observation that environments in nature seemingly vary according to common rules or regularities. They proposed that organisms can learn how previous environments changed, and then use this information for their evolutionary advantage in the future. For example, if the available seeds tended to vary in size and hardness along history, then bird species might have learned to develop beaks with an easily tunable size and strength.
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
As a wise man once said, entropy is a beotch!
That’s correct. It is stochastic. Big difference.
Live by the sword. Die by the sword.
Life is dependent upon increasing environmental entropy in order to maintain a local pocket of reduced entropy.
Evolution follows the laws of physics like everything else. It is therefore limited in the direction it can take.
So it’s governed by a law then....and, let me guess...laws evolve as well.....and don’t necessarily have a lawmaker either.....
The "laws" are simply part of the fabric of the universe. There is no need for a lawmaker.
“The “laws” are simply part of the fabric of the universe. There is no need for a lawmaker.”
By definition, a law requires a lawmaker. Try again.
Fabric of the Universe....sounds like Carl Sagan.....lol.....
"a statement of an order or relation of phenomena that so far as is known is invariable under the given conditions b: a general relation proved or assumed to hold between mathematical or logical expressions"
Making up definitions is a liars game.
Then abandon evolutionary beliefs.
I looked up the defibiyion of “law” as it applied to science and there wasn’t any mention of “lawgiver”. Lying for God is never right.
Like I said, then abandon evolutionary beliefs.
If you don't like facts, go to the Religion forum. They're not allowed there.
Your facts, as it applies to evolutionary beliefs, are very ephemeral, an illusion as it is.
Is that really you, Yoda?
“Making up definitions is a liars game.”
Screw you pal.
Why don’t you push your liberal secular agenda elsewhere.
I’m no liar. You can take your last statement and shove it.
6 a: a statement of an order or relation of phenomena that so far as is known is invariable under the given conditions b: a general relation proved or assumed to hold between mathematical or logical expressions
I see that you chose #6. Did you not see definition 1a?:1 a (1): a binding custom or practice of a community : a rule of conduct or action prescribed or formally recognized as binding or enforced by a controlling authority.
My guess is you chose to ignore that to call to bolster your argument... and then call *me* a liar. Putz.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.