Posted on 11/04/2008 7:33:53 PM PST by NationalConservative
Edited on 11/04/2008 7:58:23 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
We cannot continue to nominate intellectual and ideological lightweights............."
Don’t blame Sarah. Blame Bush for his handling of the economy when he should have pushed harder in the congress for more oversight. Blame RINO’s in congress in 2003 for not pushing the Dems into excepting oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Blame the democrats for saying they wouldn’t go along with oversight! This is what happens when you don’t have a spine!
Wrong night for your tripe. Get lost newb.
Of COURSE SHE IS!!!
And she will make a PERFECT President in 2012!!!!!
Lightweight, no way
Now isn’t the time or place.
Kiss off you fool.
Get real, vice presidential candidates don’t usually have novel ideas. Look at Biden.
Palin didn’t loose the election for us. She’s the reason it is as close as it is.
Now, she can have her own voice without being tied up with McCain. We get to see who Palin really is. She gets to come up with her own platform and get her own people to run things.
Let’s see how she does without McCain.
Nobody’s going to get you started because nobody cares what you have to say. Go back and crawl under your rock, after you’ve finished your Obama victory dance, Troll!
Palin’s done a helluva lot more for conservativism in this country than you have.
Disappear!
STFU. ***IF*** there’s going to be a 2012, I’m voting for Palin.
Please pull this thread.
Please pull this thread.
Get a clue before insulting me online, big boy.
***I already have a clue. You’ll need to purchase one from me. And how would you know I was a big boy unless you peeked? The most common things said to you on this thread are what you deserve to hear: STFU and IB4TZ.
You’re a lunatic.
Palin won't be the 2012 nominee. She appeals very strongly to a rapidly shrinking demographic. I think the 2012 nominee will be someone totally new to the scene.
We’ll see.
We don’t even know if Palin wants to run. If she does, and defeats heavyweights like Jindal or maybe Gingrich, she will have proven her metal.
Novel ideas and unique approach? Got any suggestions? What exactly do you find wrong with the old ideas?
Most conservative principles are conservative principles because they’ve been tested and proven. That’s not to say that conservatives are stagnant and boring. But they don’t jump on novelty just for the sake of novelty.
Do you work in the fashion industry?
“IBTZ and STFU”
I second that.
You’re right! And McCain was a millstone around her neck.
Harumph. A twoll speaks.
A “unique approach to conservatism” is the stupidest idea I’ve ever heard.
Palin has a traditional approach to conservatism, the only approach to conservatism.
“Dont blame Sarah. Blame Bush for his handling of the economy when he should have pushed harder in the congress for more oversight. Blame RINOs in congress in 2003 for not pushing the Dems into excepting oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Blame the democrats for saying they wouldnt go along with oversight! This is what happens when you dont have a spine!”
Bingo!
Plus the fence, plus given 2000, the election fraud, plus...
Hey noob...YOU go back to your hole. I’ve HAD it with RINO’s. The BUSH Bllue bloods have ruined this party. ENOUGH of this centrist CRAP.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.