Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/27/2008 11:57:53 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: joesbucks

No the Democrats don’t need the Fairness doctrine, but they will want it to silence their critics. When the first bailout bill was announced it was conservative talk radio that got the voters to call in. They don’t want you to know what they are doing! That way they can sneak things through. Who is going to challenge them MSM? I doubt it! Conservative Talk radio keeps them honest!


2 posted on 10/28/2008 12:40:35 AM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks
Will Jack Cafferty be balanced by David Duke? How about Andrea Mitchell being offset by Steve Forbes? Rachel Madcow, the male version of Keith Olberman, could offset 1% of Glenn Beck. Bob Shiefer will alternate broadcasts with Bill O’Reilly in the “Curmudgeon Hour”. Naturally, the courts will decide these things.
3 posted on 10/28/2008 3:16:17 AM PDT by Dilbert56 (Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: joesbucks

It is no longer to be refer to as the “fairness doctrine”.

It is “The Censorship Doctrine”

Please have the mod change your title accordingly.

It is time that we stop having the Leftist define the terms.


4 posted on 10/28/2008 7:17:17 AM PDT by Chickensoup ('08 VOTING for the SUPREME COURT that will be BEST for my FAMILY and voting for SARAH PALIN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson