1 posted on
10/27/2008 11:57:53 PM PDT by
joesbucks
To: joesbucks
No the Democrats don’t need the Fairness doctrine, but they will want it to silence their critics. When the first bailout bill was announced it was conservative talk radio that got the voters to call in. They don’t want you to know what they are doing! That way they can sneak things through. Who is going to challenge them MSM? I doubt it! Conservative Talk radio keeps them honest!
2 posted on
10/28/2008 12:40:35 AM PDT by
tallyhoe
To: joesbucks
Will Jack Cafferty be balanced by David Duke? How about Andrea Mitchell being offset by Steve Forbes? Rachel Madcow, the male version of Keith Olberman, could offset 1% of Glenn Beck. Bob Shiefer will alternate broadcasts with Bill O’Reilly in the “Curmudgeon Hour”. Naturally, the courts will decide these things.
3 posted on
10/28/2008 3:16:17 AM PDT by
Dilbert56
(Harry Reid, D-Nev.: "We're going to pick up Senate seats as a result of this war.")
To: joesbucks
It is no longer to be refer to as the “fairness doctrine”.
It is “The Censorship Doctrine”
Please have the mod change your title accordingly.
It is time that we stop having the Leftist define the terms.
4 posted on
10/28/2008 7:17:17 AM PDT by
Chickensoup
('08 VOTING for the SUPREME COURT that will be BEST for my FAMILY and voting for SARAH PALIN!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson