Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fossil find may document largest snake
Science News ^ | October 16th, 2008 | Sid Perkins

Posted on 10/19/2008 5:55:54 PM PDT by Soliton

Rocks beneath a coal mine in Colombia have yielded fossils of what could be the world’s largest snake, a relative of today’s boa constrictor that was12.8 meters long and weighed more than a ton.

Few of today’s snakes exceed 9 meters in length, says Jonathan Bloch, a vertebrate paleontologist at the Florida Museum of Natural History at the University of Florida in Gainesville. Some of the snakes that lived about 60 million years ago, however, would have dwarfed their modern kin, he reported Wednesday in Cleveland at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology.

At a site in northern Colombia, Bloch and his colleagues unearthed the partial remains of an ancient snake. Each of the dozen or so vertebrae in that body segment measured about 10 centimeters across. That’s about twice the width of the largest vertebra taken from a 6-meter–long, modern-day anaconda, another modern relative, Bloch notes.

None of the ribs included in the fossil are complete, but the size and curvature of the fragments that remain indicate that the snake “would have had trouble fitting though the door into your office,” he adds. The gargantuan fossils represent an as yet unnamed species.

Estimating a snake’s length from fragmentary remains is difficult because most of the creature’s vertebrae differ only in their size, not in their proportions. Bloch and his colleagues can’t readily determine whether the segment that they unearthed came from the thickest portion of the snake, so their estimates of the snake’s size and weight are minimum values. The researchers contend that the ancient snake they discovered would have stretched at least 12.8 meters and weighed at least 1.27 metric tons.

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencenews.org ...


TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: evolution
That's a big snake.
1 posted on 10/19/2008 5:55:54 PM PDT by Soliton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Soliton

2 posted on 10/19/2008 6:00:02 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass ("Annoy the media, elect PALIN and McCAIN....errr....McCAIN / PALIN.....McPALIN" 8^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
That's sobering. Hate to think of the prey for a 40 + foot snake. I'm sure you have given a great deal of thought as to how they got him on the ark. ;)
3 posted on 10/19/2008 6:04:59 PM PDT by JimSEA (just another liberal-bashing fearmonger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

I’m really glad that snake is extinct!


4 posted on 10/19/2008 6:07:40 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman

I’d like to see Bear Grylls eat that snake!


5 posted on 10/19/2008 6:25:55 PM PDT by Soliton (Faith is an act of love; Love is an act of faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
I'm sure you have given a great deal of thought as to how they got him on the ark. ;)

As you know, Noah was instructed to take 2 of each clean animal and 7 of each unclean animal. That was so they could use the 5 extra unclean animals to feed the giant snakes!

6 posted on 10/19/2008 6:28:19 PM PDT by Soliton (Faith is an act of love; Love is an act of faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JimSEA
The two brontosauruses carried him and his 57 Foot lover on board.
7 posted on 10/19/2008 6:31:42 PM PDT by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at 100 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
The two brontosauruses carried him and his 57 Foot lover on board.

Brontosaurus on the ark? I can see it now:

Q. What's harder than getting a pregnant Brontosaurus into the ark?

A. Getting a Brontosaurus pregnant in the ark!

(Noah! Make them stop. I'm getting seasick!)


8 posted on 10/19/2008 7:04:04 PM PDT by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
There were twelve guys originally


9 posted on 10/19/2008 8:07:37 PM PDT by Goonch (Bagarius "goonch” Yarrelli - my friends call me Goonch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson