Hopefully yet another “conference on global warming” will be snowed out.
So, which is it? The “scientists” appear to be very confused these days. In fact, it appears as though they have no “consensus” - which, of course, is required to declare anything “science” these days!
LOL. What a crock. Global warming is for those who don’t believe in God. Frankly, a whole bunch of left wing “mularkey” is a substitute for God for some.
They must have gotten their hands on a copy of the Farmer’s Almanac.
Snow is racist. :)
Isn’t there some point spelled out Nobel’s will at which Gore has to give the prize back?
No, it’s global COOLING now.. get it right! LOL.
The Farmers Almanac had this out awhile back. They were in clear contradiction to the NWS I recall.
For those in the eastern half of the country, it’s colder than normal. No reason.
For those in the western half of the country, GLOBAL WARMING!! WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE!!
Coming from those that can't tell me with any confidence what the weather is going to be like in three days, even with BILLIONS of dollars worth of satellites and prediction equipment.
I think I will believe my trusty "Farmers Almanac" first.
They claim to be right just over eighty percent of the time.
PING with a Let it snow prayer!!!!
“Some scientists believe it is in result of climate change, or global warming.”
They are using the terms together in case everyone did not get the memo. It has changed to GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE!
“Some scientists believe it is in result of climate change, or global warming.”
Ah yes, the good old horse**it “catch all” phrase rears it’s ugly head.
It’s getting pathetic. Now it’s multiple choice.
You know how the scientists knew this will be a colder winter?.......They read the Farmers Almanac.
Recently, I took it upon myself to debunk global warming using only the writings of the GW activists themselves. Here is one of my posts from another site that summarizes why the "science" of global warming can't be taken seriously.
------------------------------------------------------------
Claims that global average temperatures during Medieval times were warmer than present-day are based on a number of false premises that a) confuse past evidence of drought/precipitation with temperature evidence, b) fail to distinguish regional from global-scale temperature variations...
http://tinyurl.com/y238rb
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Objection: It was just as warm in the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) as it is today. In fact, Greenland was green and they were growing grapes in England!
Answer: There is no good evidence that the MWP was a globally warm period comparable to today. Regionally, there may have been places that exhibited notable warmth -- Europe, for example -- but all global proxy reconstructions agree it is warmer now, and the temperature is rising faster now, than at any time in the last one or even two thousand years. Anecdotal evidence of wineries in England and Norse farmers in Greenland do not amount to a global assessment.
http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2006/12/13/221054/33
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Arctic: Losing Its Cool
-----------------------------------------
What this means for the rest of us While the Arctic melt has profound effects on the region's people and ecosystems, it also spells trouble for the rest of the world. For instance, the changes to the ocean's circulation system would mean that though some places will get much warmer, other places, such as Europe, which won't get the warmth from the Gulf Stream, will get much cooler.
http://www.fightglobalwarming.com/page.cfm?tagID=261
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the first two global warming sources, cited above, regional warming is used to attempt to refute the idea that the earth was warmer during the Medieval Warm Period than it is today (despite the fact that CO2 levels would've been lower). However in the last source, cited immediately above, regional climate patterns are used as evidence for global warming!
Again: regional climate patterns are used both to explain - and explain away - global warming from global warming "experts" themselves! In other words, evidence for global warming based on regional climate patterns can't be used as evidence against global warming skeptics based on regional climate patterns! You don't have to be a climate scientist or an "expert" to refute this stuff! You just have to read what the alleged "experts" on global warming are writing! And what they write - time after time after time - is self-contradictory!