Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TrailofTears; wagglebee; cpforlife.org; narses; ELS; Caleb1411; rhema; Mr. Silverback
If you are the author, you might want to research a bit deeper on what took place in Obama's work to protect the abortion method known as 'induced labor abortion', because sentences like the following one are grossly inaccurate, under emphasizing the real truth, focusing upon the misdiretcion Obama has posed:

"Today we have a candidate running for president representing one of our major parties that not only embraces abortion on demand until the very moment of birth, but has voted to extend that ‘right' to end up with a dead baby to those babies who survive the abortionists knives and are actually born alive.."

Obama was fighting to keep legal a heinous abortion method becoming popular with abortionist murderers. He was not fighting to block medical attention for alive babies who survive an abortionist's knife.

Induced labor abortion is the planned premature birth and then killing by neglect of the struggling premature alive child. Let me explain further.

With induced labor abortion, the abortionist places a 'laminary' in the cervical os, to slowly stretch the cervical opening. Then the pregnant female is given drugs to induce labor and cause her body to expell the alive premature child. The abortionist thus avoids killing the alive child inside the female's body, and instead delivers an alive, struggling to breathe child who is left unattended, to die alone from suffocation. This method accomplishes two things:

1) the child is not killed or dismembered within the body of the mother, thus risk to the mother is reduced

2) the child is a more 'pristine source of fetal tissues' for harvesting and shipping to research programs in an industry amounting to billions in dollar trade/value.

It is important to note that Barack Obama was protecting this heinous method of killing the alive unborn (by causing them to be born prematurely then in an act of infanticide these struggling children are left to die 'of natural causes'). These bastard democrat ghouls have shaped the argument to hide the truth of their protection for after birth infanticide, as a way to get rid of unwanted alive children.

If you're going to address this evil, please distinguish it from the false trail the Obama and democrat ghouls have fashioned to try and hide their evil work.

5 posted on 10/06/2008 11:08:59 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
Good points on the specifics of the technique. The reason I approached it like i did was because it was a general reality and that how we got to a live child who was to be murdered was less important than the fact that we got to that point.

Perhaps you should address the issue specifically in a way for others to understand. Nevertheless the real important thing in all of this is that he voted three times for babies born alive to be allowed to be refused medical treatment.

Without a doubt he is a ghoul and verges on madness as a human being. God save us from such wicked men being elected in our nation.

6 posted on 10/06/2008 4:32:24 PM PDT by TrailofTears (."We mock loyalty and are shocked at finding traitors in our midst." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson