Posted on 10/02/2008 5:18:59 PM PDT by LibWhacker
Adnan Oktar, a creationist and rival of Richard Dawkins, has offered trillions of pounds to any scientists who can show proof of evolution.
Mr Oktar, 52, who successfully campaigned for Mr Dawkins' official website to be banned in Turkey, has said he will give 10 trillion Turkish lira, roughly equal to £4.4trn "to anyone who produces a single intermediate-form fossil demonstrating evolution."
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
“SHOW ME THE PROCESS....step by step, baby ....you can’t becaue the EVOLUTION can’t hopscotch....it has to be VERY PRECISE......”
It is, and the path is quite clear. Evolution and Christianity are completely compatible. Evolution IS Creationism.
Weellllllll.....show us all, please.
Ask a specific question.
“Its not missing.
The links are all there.”
Oh, really?!?!?
Which one was the last ape and which one was the first human?
Are Neanderthals human?
Yes, Neanderthals are human AND coexisted with modern man.
Now, back to your claims.
Which was the last ape and which was the first man.
By all means, feel free to cheer the Islamist and convicted criminal.
How did your pretense that there is no missing link turn into me having to prove your point?
Where is the transition from ape to man?
A very safe bet because whatever fossil evidence may be presented will never be good enough. Thus, no money shelled out.
When walking from a forest into a swamp there isn't a single line where the forest turns into a swamp, a clear line where one side of the line it is forest and the other side swamp. The forest just gets swampier and swampier until there you are.
Those skulls just get more and more human like until there you are.
Why does he need a fossil? The guy’s never heard of MRSA??
I don’t know which is worse, your lack of logic or your lack of science?
The “clear line” you’re avoiding is God’s creation of man.
Which is separate and distinct from any changes and adaptations that occurred in the ape species.
Where on that chart do you think humanity began?
I’m NOT playing your game!!
You would pretend that apes “evolved” and at some point God tossed in a soul.
They are different creations of God!
I refuse to accept the photos as “evidence” on the basis of science.
Let’s not pretend that a sequence of unidentified photos are “proof” of anything.
What is “missing” is scientific evidence that one of these creatures “evolved” into the next!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nothing in Science is “proof”. Science doesn't deal in “proof” it deals in evidence.
The skulls are real. They are evidence of human evolution. You refuse to accept them as evidence because of your religious beliefs about special creation, God, and the soul. You said so yourself. Let us not pretend you have Scientific objections after the fact. You said the line between human and ape was determined by God, but there is no way of measuring which skull had a human soul and which did not, we can only determine to what extent those skulls are similar to modern humans. The older the fossil the less similar they are. Change is a species is evolution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.