Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stonehenge 'was hidden from lower classes'
Telegraph ^ | Sunday, August 31, 2008 | "How about that?" editor

Posted on 08/31/2008 8:04:57 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

Archeologists have uncovered the remains of what they believe to be a 20ft fence designed to screen Stonehenge from the view of unworthy Stone Age Britons. The wooden construction extended nearly two miles across Salisbury Plain more than 5,000 years ago, and would have served to shield the sacred site from the prying eyes of ordinary lower-class locals... The dig's co-director Dr Josh Pollard, of Bristol University, said: "The construction must have taken a lot of manpower. The palisade is an open structure which would not have been defensive and was too high to be practical for controlling livestock. It certainly wasn't for hunting herded animals and so, like everything else in this ceremonial landscape, we have to believe it must have had a religious significance. The most plausible explanation is that it was built at huge cost to the community to screen the environs of Stonehenge from view. Basically, we think it was to keep the lower classes from seeing what exactly their rulers and the priestly class were doing."

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: godsgravesglyphs; stonehenge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: Verginius Rufus

Nope, turns out Merlin was gay, and the whole Stonehenge complex needed a wall around it for nude sunbathing. ;’)


21 posted on 09/01/2008 6:22:15 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Looks like a fort. :’) Nope, ceremonial purposes. ;’D Thanks FN.

All, there are a few topics about large Stonehenge-like sites in Brittany, Germany, and Russia (at least). Check the keyword above.


22 posted on 09/01/2008 6:23:52 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Could have been. It’s not unlikely that the wall was there to keep the sacrifice victims from making a run for it.


23 posted on 09/01/2008 6:39:43 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

How was the height of the fence determined?


24 posted on 09/01/2008 7:58:47 AM PDT by curmudgeonII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reeses

Spoken like a true capitalist!


25 posted on 09/01/2008 8:36:45 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Posting from deep behind the Maple Curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: curmudgeonII

Probably by how high the researchers were. ;’)


26 posted on 09/01/2008 9:04:20 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: xp38

Lol! I guess I walked into THAT one!!!


27 posted on 09/01/2008 1:37:12 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson