Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California Activist Proposes Wealth Tax and Probably Unconstitutional Exit Tax
Tax foundation.org ^ | 8-25-08 | Joseph Henchman and Paul Galindo

Posted on 08/27/2008 4:22:08 PM PDT by dynachrome

Earlier this month, a California activist began gathering signatures to put a state wealth tax on the ballot. The measure would impose a new 35% income surtax (in addition to federal taxes and the existing 10.3% top state rate), and penalize people who leave the state by seizing 55% of assets exceeding $20 million. The money raised would be used to eliminate the state's budget deficit and for purchasing controlling shares in large corporations.

The 17.5% surtax is unusual because it would be on a taxpayer's total (not marginal) income whenever it exceeds $250,000, with another additional 17.5 percent tax on total income (for a total additional 35 percent tax) whenever it exceeds $500,000. In the case of single taxpayers or taxpayers filing as head of household, these additional taxes would be levied on incomes greater than $150,000 and $350,000 respectively.

So say someone has adjusted gross income of $1,000,000 and taxable income of $750,000. Today, their tax bill would be:

Federal Income Tax (35% top rate): $241,574

State Income Tax (9.3% top rate): $67,555

Payroll Taxes: $41,648

Total Income and Payroll Taxes: $350,777

Effective Tax Rate: 35%

With the new surtaxes, it would look like this:

Federal Income Tax (35% top rate): $241,574

State Income Tax (9.3% top rate): $67,555

Proposed Initiative Surtax (35%): $262,500

Payroll Taxes: $41,648

Total Income and Payroll Taxes: $613,278

Effective Tax Rate: 61%

(Excerpt) Read more at taxfoundation.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: california; govwatch; marxism; taxes
It will probably pass. What nut jobs.
1 posted on 08/27/2008 4:22:08 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
and penalize people who leave the state by seizing 55% of assets exceeding $20 million

Old news. Originally proposed in the 1850's by an obscure professor by the name of K. Marx.

Dude was mad as a hatter and ignored by everyone except a few French loonies.

Funny how it keeps coming up.

2 posted on 08/27/2008 4:24:40 PM PDT by Regulator (Obama = Mugabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

are there accurate numbers on the wealthy that have removed themselves from california?


3 posted on 08/27/2008 4:25:55 PM PDT by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

They are just copying NY...


4 posted on 08/27/2008 4:26:48 PM PDT by xcamel (Conservatives start smart, and get rich, liberals start rich, and get stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

This is probably more a ego trip for the submitters. You need some serious cash to pay signature gathers. If you look at the actual text among the goals of this prop is to use the tax money to buy majority shares of oil companies, Ford and GM and investment banks so these companies would be forced to go green. I think this prop is even too much for the public sector unions or Silicon Valley to pay signature gathers for.


5 posted on 08/27/2008 4:29:17 PM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Would this be constitutional? Suppose your wealth is outside California. How can Calif. taxing authorities levy taxes against it? And they are going to charge you an exit tax if you want to move out of staet? Is this the carrot and stick approach to encourage you to stay in Calif.?????

This seems too bizarre.


6 posted on 08/27/2008 4:43:00 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Becoming more and more socialist all the time....


7 posted on 08/27/2008 4:43:52 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

I’m moving. F California.


8 posted on 08/27/2008 4:44:27 PM PDT by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21

So what would keep the ‘wealthy’ from moving their money out of state and THEN ‘exiting’?

I’m sure this will encourage the wealthy to move into CA.


9 posted on 08/27/2008 4:44:36 PM PDT by driftdiver (No More Obama - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

“California Activist Proposes Wealth Tax and Probably Unconstitutional Exit Tax “

EXIT TAX?? Give me a break! They want to charge me if I leave? How ‘bout an “Entrance TAX” for illegal aliens...we’d be in the black in a year!

What a bunch of morons.


10 posted on 08/27/2008 4:47:54 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

i don’t understand your post.

california is taxing itself to death.

many younger people have left the state because they can’t afford to live here.

many middle class and professionals have sought bigger and cheaper houses in az, nm, co, mt, wy, ut, nv etc.

many rich people have moved their assets out of state to avoid excessive taxes. rush limbaugh keeps saying he’d like to live here, but can’t afford the taxes.


11 posted on 08/27/2008 4:49:49 PM PDT by ken21 (people die and you never hear from them again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

EXIT TAX

I would have nothing left to tax. What I hadn’t hidden, I would burn.


12 posted on 08/27/2008 4:50:37 PM PDT by dynachrome (Henry Bowman is right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ken21

Please add an improperly assumed /sarc tag and my last post should make sense.

CA is a beautiful state, except for the govt and fruits that run it.


13 posted on 08/27/2008 4:52:19 PM PDT by driftdiver (No More Obama - The corruption has not changed despite all our hopes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“goals of this prop is to use the tax money to buy majority shares of oil companies, Ford and GM and investment banks so these companies would be forced to go green”

That makes the proposal even funnier, of course. Imagine those nutbags running a business. That’s what it would boil down to. Green commissars.


14 posted on 08/27/2008 4:53:40 PM PDT by dynachrome (Henry Bowman is right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
and penalize people who leave the state by seizing 55%
of assets exceeding $20 million.

Why not build one of these....





None needed along the boarder of Mexico, of course...

Mr. Schwarzenegger, tear down that wall...


15 posted on 08/27/2008 4:54:18 PM PDT by DaveTesla (You can fool some of the people some of the time......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; calcowgirl

Get a load of this.


16 posted on 08/27/2008 4:56:00 PM PDT by AuntB ( "During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson