Skip to comments.
Energy Boom in West Threatens Indian Artifacts
The New York Slimes ^
| August 2, 2008
| Kirk Johnson
Posted on 08/04/2008 10:38:49 AM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
1
posted on
08/04/2008 10:38:49 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
To: SunkenCiv
2
posted on
08/04/2008 10:40:04 AM PDT
by
mgc1122
To: blam; StayAt HomeMother; Ernest_at_the_Beach; 1ofmanyfree; 21twelve; 24Karet; 2ndDivisionVet; ...
3
posted on
08/04/2008 10:41:56 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: mgc1122
Absolute Bravo Sierra. On Federal land an archaeological survey of any planned rig road, drill site, or pipeline route is mandatory, as are Raptor surveys, rare plants, endangered species, and whatever else they can think of, even on reclaimed rig/production road routes.
4
posted on
08/04/2008 10:43:14 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: mgc1122
Bravo Item Nuts George Orange.
5
posted on
08/04/2008 10:45:08 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: SunkenCiv
Wanted to read this story. Really did. But I couldn't get past this:
At Nine Mile Canyon in central Utah, truck exhaust on a road to the gas fields is posing a threat...
6
posted on
08/04/2008 10:45:18 AM PDT
by
Flycatcher
(Strong copy for a strong America)
To: SunkenCiv
drill for carbon dioxideDrill for what??????
7
posted on
08/04/2008 10:46:36 AM PDT
by
Foolsgold
("We live in the greatest country in the world and I am going to change it" Barry O'boomarang 2008)
To: SunkenCiv
What a load, they were nomadic and scattered their crap all over the country.
Once they moved on it was abandon, plow it under.
8
posted on
08/04/2008 10:49:00 AM PDT
by
dalereed
(both)
To: Smokin' Joe; SunkenCiv
Forcing the private sector to underwrite their excavaton and documentation is the only way 90 percent of these sites will EVER be excavated.
9
posted on
08/04/2008 10:51:29 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
(They screwed up their own countries so bad they had to leave, and now they're here screwing up ours)
To: Foolsgold
drill for carbon dioxide>br> Drill for what?????? LOL! That caught my eye too! I guess with people driving less, now there's a shortage? ;-)
10
posted on
08/04/2008 10:52:29 AM PDT
by
maryz
To: SunkenCiv
“a giant new project to drill for carbon dioxide”
This author is getting hysterical. I wonder which environmental group(s) he gets his information from?
11
posted on
08/04/2008 10:56:40 AM PDT
by
popdonnelly
(Boycott Washington D.C. until they allow gun ownership)
To: SunkenCiv
Yeah, the culprit is old man Bush disturbing the Indian burial ground for oil. He would’ve gotten aways with it if it wasn’t for us gosh darn kids, er, journalists.
12
posted on
08/04/2008 10:58:04 AM PDT
by
Clemenza
(McCain/Palin; Maverick and the MILF)
To: SunkenCiv
Obviously the New York Times is against all forms of energy generation.
Which is ok. Soon enough they’ll be turning out the lights which will save us a ton.
13
posted on
08/04/2008 10:59:08 AM PDT
by
VeniVidiVici
(A kid at McDonalds has more real-world work experience than Barack Hussein.)
To: SunkenCiv
is posing a threat, environmentalists and Indian tribes say, to 2,000 years of rock art and imagery. In Montana, a coal-fired power plant has been proposed near Great Falls on one of the last wild sections of the Lewis and Clark trail. First of all I would like to repeat my position about unnamed "environmentalists and indian tribes."
My experience ahs been these are always a few obscure, ignorant and bitter individuals, whose sole goal in life is to feel important, by bringing the rest of the world to a halt.
Even toxic waste dumps can be charaterized as "unique." Doesn't mean that they must be preserved in their "pristine" state.
Indian rock drawings? Assuming (big if) that they are worth saving what is the rationalization? We can admire them them while we are freezing in the dark?
What's that defintion of insanity again?
14
posted on
08/04/2008 11:00:13 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
To: popdonnelly
This author is getting hysterical. I wonder which environmental group(s) he gets his information from?,p>I don't know and I don't want to know.
But I would like to really **** him off by reiterating that as far as I'm concerned, there is not a single thing that indians have contributed that I feel I couldn't live without. Nothing.
Now, if they had had the brains to invent the wheel, or even writing, I might reconsider...
15
posted on
08/04/2008 11:04:04 AM PDT
by
Publius6961
(You're Government, it's not your money, and you never have to show a profit.)
To: Foolsgold
16
posted on
08/04/2008 11:04:34 AM PDT
by
A. Patriot
(CZ 52's ROCK)
To: 3AngelaD
It is currently the cost of doing business in the oil patch, another hidden tax, but one the industry embraces. At least where I work, and in most areas, the people who work there live there for the most part. No one wants to mess up their own back yard.
Yet even our local paper carried an AP piece about how energy issues allegedly put sensitive areas in peril, which read like a Wilderness Society press release and included the Little Missouri Grasslands, an area of go-back land (former, failed homesteads) they tried to make into a Wilderness area about 20 years ago.
Sorry no link, the paper did not put the story on their website.
17
posted on
08/04/2008 11:08:37 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: Foolsgold; popdonnelly
Yeah, ya gotta love that one. I hear it was Bush who cut off that federal program which provided dehydrated water to the reservations in arid states.
18
posted on
08/04/2008 11:28:28 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______Profile hasn't been updated since Friday, May 30, 2008)
To: SunkenCiv
No problem.. All they have to do is remove the pipe when the resources run out.
19
posted on
08/04/2008 12:30:40 PM PDT
by
Vlaxo
To: SunkenCiv
Being part Native American, I don't like to see the Native Culture plowed under any more than I entertain the thought of someone plowing under the Smithsonian Institution buildings, the Capitol or the White House. There has to be a way to save the artifacts and to use the resources under the artifacts without obliterating or destroying the land.
If we can put a man on the Moon and build a Space Station, we have the ability to save the artifacts and make use of the resources under the artifacts.
These Native American artifacts are family heirlooms and are just as important as the items your family has passed down from generation to generation. Maybe these artifact/heirlooms got "misplaced" or "lost" or "left" by our ancestors, but they are still very important to us and should be important to anyone who lives in the USofA.
20
posted on
08/04/2008 1:38:21 PM PDT
by
HighlyOpinionated
(I'm voting for J.S.McCain because he didn't take any money from the Palestinians (like BHO did).)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson