Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN Panelist: Cut Off America's Racist Head
CNN Anderson Cooper Show | 7/14/08

Posted on 07/14/2008 8:32:32 PM PDT by Williams

Was just watching Anderson Cooper's CNN show, which focused on the New Yorker's satirical Obama cover. One of the panelists, an African American gentleman whose name I missed, approvingly repeated a quote (I think from Ossie Davis) that the New Yorker cover is "America attempting to raise its ugly racist head, and we must be prepared to cut it off"!

I felt the rest of the panelists wince in shock, but they said nothing to condemn the remark. As you know, the New Yorker is a liberal magazine that was spoofing misconceptions about Obama, it is hardly a KKK periodical. Seemed like a hateful and inappropriate remark about America to me. My reaction is that this sort of comment can only hurt Obama with many Americans.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society
KEYWORDS: andersoncooper; cnn; newyorker; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 07/14/2008 8:32:32 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Williams

This is so sweet....the left is in deep conflict over appearing hip and “getting” the “irony” of The New Yorker cover, or condemning it for inadvertantly confirming the “fears” of those who “cling to their religion and their guns”.....I love it.


2 posted on 07/14/2008 8:37:55 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Fire mission!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Seemed like a hateful and inappropriate remark about America to me.

No, sounds like something Michelle Ma Belle would say...

3 posted on 07/14/2008 8:37:57 PM PDT by Old Sarge (CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Satire can reveal truth. This cover delivers 100%.
Wolf Blitzer on CNN was acting all out angry to the editor. Liberals hating liberals. What’s not to love!


4 posted on 07/14/2008 8:43:49 PM PDT by mojo114
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

What is so hilarious is that magazine is just so, well, “sophisticated” with their high art of satire, and we, by contrast are just such gap toothed unwashed and uneducated country bumkin rednecks, who don’t even read that stupid rag, and we don’t GET IT.  We just see the picture and well, just dayum, whad I tell you Marge, it’s true!!  Lookee there, they’re even burnin a flag in the fireplace!! 
Wow, that worked out just real well, didn’t it?


5 posted on 07/14/2008 8:45:03 PM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
The worst thing about this cover, is the utter contempt it conveys of conservatives by the magazine.
It assumes Obamas idea of conservatives as a group of angry, buck toothed, unshaven, dimwits.
6 posted on 07/14/2008 8:49:08 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mojo114

And yet they could have had Dick Cheney as a cross-dressing Nazi Cannibal on the cover and Wolf wouldn’t have opened his filty spew-hole....


7 posted on 07/14/2008 8:51:35 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Fire mission!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland

Hey, I shaved today.


8 posted on 07/14/2008 8:56:16 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Demorats tax returns consists of "welfare in" and " child support out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wequalswinner

I wonder could we compile all the msm cartoons and magazine covers showing Bush as a monkey, a nazi, a whatever....? Can we now look at all of these as having been poking fun at left wing extremists?


9 posted on 07/14/2008 8:58:55 PM PDT by compound w
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: compound w

Naah, we’re just not that smart /s


10 posted on 07/14/2008 9:03:07 PM PDT by SaintDismas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mojo114
"Satire can reveal truth. This cover delivers 100%."

Which is why I am lucky to have obtained the last copy in the store today.

I believe "The New Yorker" cover will take some votes away from Obama, and that certainly is good for America.


11 posted on 07/14/2008 9:03:58 PM PDT by Prole (Pray for the families of Chris and Channon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Williams
As you know, the New Yorker is a liberal magazine that was spoofing misconceptions about Obama

I don't know that at all.

Obama was taught the Koran despite being raised by an athiest mother, and he only became a "Christian" to boost his political career in Southside Chicago. Twenty years of applauding Reverend Wright definitely qualifies the B. Hussein Obamas as extremist America-haters.

So where's the "spoof" and what are the "misconceptions"?

12 posted on 07/14/2008 9:05:32 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
One of the panelists, an African American gentleman whose name I missed, approvingly repeated a quote (I think from Ossie Davis) that the New Yorker cover is "America attempting to raise its ugly racist head, and we must be prepared to cut it off"!

Aren't reactions like this just the reason The New Yorker ran the cover. I mean, McCain hasn't raised any racial issues or made any accusation about Obama's background either on on Black Liberation Theology or Marxism. Someone has to get the ball rolling so all McCain supporters can be labeled as the vile miscreants everyone knows they are.

13 posted on 07/14/2008 9:06:00 PM PDT by JimSEA (Kaffur and proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The New Yorker cover is just the latest version of the dingbat professor painting racist slogans on her own car and then phoning it in as a “hate crime,” the countless nooses and racial epithets attached to or painted on dorm room doors by their semi-deranged residents, who, upon getting fingered as the authors of the hate crimes directed at themselves, claim it was all an exercise in “performance art” designed to “raise questions” among the complacent white booj-wah-zie. Oh, and also get their names on the evening news, never a small consideration for these types.


14 posted on 07/14/2008 9:29:37 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Without the second, the rest are just politicians' BS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
If a Conservative Magazine did the same thing to one of our own, the libs would feel vindicated.

As a Conservative, I don't feel vindicated about Obama. To me it's just another “poor Obama” moment for the bleeding heart white guilt liberals to latch on to.

I wonder what it's like to wake up every day being an ignorant unhappy progressive. On second thought, I don't.

15 posted on 07/14/2008 9:38:34 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (If it looks like a lib, smells like a lib and whines like a lib, it must be an Obama voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Obama is the first to run for president of a generation of Americans taught throughout public school life that America’s heritage and history is something to be despised. He has plenty of company to vote for him.

It probably seems all too natural to his supporters that the flag should be burning and headed for the ash heap of history, and a new beginning of leftist utopia thus be enabled. That’s one of the salient grains of truth this cartoon reveals, but the magazine’s editors failed to see past their own spite for Obama doubters to realize what they were publishing. Just my perception.


16 posted on 07/14/2008 10:21:36 PM PDT by Tellurian (Perception is interesting. Truth is overwhelming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tellurian

Good analysis. I agree completely.


17 posted on 07/14/2008 10:29:17 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Was the New Yorker really being "satirical" or is this a setup like the Jackson thing was to make Obama look good?
18 posted on 07/14/2008 10:36:30 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
The best things to come out of the New Yorker were the cartoons of Charles Addams.
19 posted on 07/14/2008 10:38:02 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tellurian
Key questions:

1.) This week's issue of "The New Yorker" sold out in a few hours at my local bookstores. Do you believe that these sales will encourage any future cartoons of Obama from other magazines?

2.) Given Obama's harsh reaction to the magazine, do you think "The New Yorker" will fall in line behind Obama or continue satirical drawings of him in the future?

3.) While it was intended as satire, do you think that there is an ulterior motive?

4.) Why is McCain being such a pandering wimp on this issue? Couldn't he have kept his big fat idiot mouth shut? Why is it so hard to say:

"I really don't know what to say, guys. It's a privately owned magazine that publishes articles, opinions and poetry. What difference does my opinion make on this matter?"


20 posted on 07/14/2008 11:14:27 PM PDT by Prole (Pray for the families of Chris and Channon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson