Posted on 06/13/2008 10:06:38 PM PDT by Spacemonkey1023
Story from the site with a producer covering a convention for less-than-lethal arms.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Maybe the shock will taze the liberal out of him.
Bombing Iran will make sense ONLY if we bomb them back into the stone age. A-bombing Japan wreaked massive death and destruction and they surrendered. Our big mistake in Iraq was NOT breaking the population’s morale so they would not resist control. If you want war to win you must destroy lives and property. Case in point: Germany in WWII, so demoralised there was no resistance to US troops. On the other hand, if that sounds too harsh, one shouldn’t fight ANY wars. It’s really a case of “either-or”. We tried a “limited” war in Viet Nam and all that did was kill our troops and make us give up. (Thanks, LBJ, you scum.)
Absolutely 100% correct.
Great post and agree with you totally.
Exactly. This is why Bush’s halfass moderate plan of going into Iraq was useless. In war your goal is not to win friends, but to DESTROY the enemy, not try to understand it, or reason with it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.