This is the kind of stupidity that will disparage anything bloggers say. There is no doubt that Barak Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen. To say otherwise, or even to insinuate otherwise, sounds about as paranoid and irrational as the “truthers”.
Does anyone really want to sound as paranoid and irrational as them?
Hillary has a plan!
thank you for saying that. I wanted to but thought I would be labeled a troll.
I think if he was ineligible to be US President then this would have been discovered ... you know like around 2004, when he first became senator, because even then we knew he’d run.
How is following the law stupid?
While it would have been nice if “legendx3” had listed and linked references, you are shooting from the hip by calling this “stupidity”. As for “there is no doubt that Barak Obama is a natural born US citizen”, yes, there is reasonable doubt.
I say this as the father of a Kenyan born daughter. Both parents are US citizens, so she was able to claim US citizenship.
You make a good point except for the minor fact that THIS APPEARS TO BE TRUE AND ACCURATE according to the relevant laws at the time! And it is getting traction.
bump ...
“There is no doubt that Barak Obama is a natural born U.S. citizen. To say otherwise, or even to insinuate otherwise, sounds about as paranoid and irrational as the “truthers”.”
I have doubts.
There _would be_ absolutely no doubt - IF he chose to make public the essential document that would unquestionably prove this to be so - his birth certificate.
He refuses to do just that, after several requests have been made for him to release it (note: the state of Hawaii does not release birth certificates to the public without the consent of the person _on_ the certificate).
WHY?
What could possibly be on it so embarassing to him? Or so revealing?
Obama is not responsible if the birth certificate reads “white” as his race. He could not control what someone else put in that category at birth.
Obama is not responsible if the birth certificate reads “Islam” as his religion. He could not control what someone else put in that category at birth.
It can’t possbily be either of these that he is afraid of. It is something else.
Questions:
1. Is it possible that the date of issuance of the certifcate does not coincide with the date of birth?
2. If so, by how many days?
3. Does the signature of the physician attending the birth appear on the certificate?
4. If not, why?
5. As improbable as it may seem, could it be that there is no birth certificate at all - and that that is the reason he hasn’t “released” it to the public?
Just wondering...
- John
Says who?