Skip to comments.
'North American Parliament' under way
worldnetdaily.com ^
| May 28, 2008
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 05/29/2008 11:30:42 AM PDT by B4Ranch
A group supporting North American integration is holding its fourth annual "North American Model Parliament" for 100 university students from the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
The North American Forum on Integration, or NAFI, began is "Triumvirate" sessions Monday in Montreal's City Hall with a plan to conclude Friday.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
TOPICS: Conspiracy; Education; History; Local News
KEYWORDS: blackhelicopters; conspiracy; corsi; cuespookymusic; delusional; nau; nwo; spp; tinfoil; wnd; worldnutdaily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
To: Czar
121
posted on
06/02/2008 9:07:23 PM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
Well, there ya' go. I'm a fascist because I favor the private sector handling non-essential governmental functions, despite the fact that the idea is a linchpin of economic conservatism.
And that would make anyone opposed to the above a communist. See how that works?
To: hedgetrimmer
And as an aside, how do you propose to prevent this creeping, infernal “fascism” first promulgated by Margaret Thatcher, and then Ronald Reagan? What governmental solution do you propose? I’m guessing more Amtraks.
To: Czar
You might try the SPP website, for starters.
To: hedgetrimmer
But now that I think about it, unless you come up with an alternative that does
not involve more government (to quash PPP's), you
are Chinese. Literally.
So have at it: let's hear your proposals for the operation of a power plant, waste treatment facility, cell phone network, etc. Without the corrupting interference of the private sector, of course. Be careful . . . .
To: 1rudeboy
I favor the private sector handling non-essential governmental functions
You're misstating. You favor PPPs which are fascism.
the idea is a linchpin of economic conservatism.
Wow, what a whopper. PPPs are the linchpin of the United Nations, and socialist EU and foreign governments all eager to loot the US economy. They are hardly 'economic conservatism'. And if you were such a proponent of economic conservatism, you'd support constitutional tariffs and the abolition of the income tax.
126
posted on
06/03/2008 6:21:06 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: 1rudeboy
first promulgated by Margaret Thatcher, and then Ronald Reagan
These people apparently weren't the conservatives they have been made out to be, by your reckoning.
127
posted on
06/03/2008 6:22:47 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: 1rudeboy
unless you come up with an alternative that does not involve more government (to quash PPP's), you are Chinese
LOLOL! Whopper two! How about Constitutional government as an alternative? You "free traders" are a laugh riot.
128
posted on
06/03/2008 6:24:09 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
Great. How does “Constitutional government” run a nuclear power plant, genius?
To: 1rudeboy
Don't kill her buzz by asking her to think.
130
posted on
06/03/2008 6:43:40 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are doom and gloomers, union members and liberals so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
Only a person with a wealth of experience could have as many drug references as you.
131
posted on
06/03/2008 6:46:21 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
Is that why you love government so much? Is that the only employer you've ever had?
132
posted on
06/03/2008 6:48:46 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are doom and gloomers, union members and liberals so bad at math?)
To: 1rudeboy
Since government spending is the only thing keeping the domestic economy from completely imploding due to the corruption of globalization and "free trade", you're worried that the government might actually get smaller if we returned to constitutionality! May your nightmare come true!
133
posted on
06/03/2008 6:49:43 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer; Toddsterpatriot
Even a simple question ties her in knots.
And [she] is heard no more: it is a tale
Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
Signifying nothing.
To: 1rudeboy
135
posted on
06/03/2008 7:01:36 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are doom and gloomers, union members and liberals so bad at math?)
To: 1rudeboy
I'd be willing, in fact eager, to reduce government spending by 50%. In her drug induced state, she would consider that proof I'm a commie.
136
posted on
06/03/2008 7:03:41 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are doom and gloomers, union members and liberals so bad at math?)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I'm trying to figure out how the operation of a power plant (for example) by a private firm is
unconstitutional. Congress has the Article I, Section 8 authority to exercise legislation over "needful buildings." There is no Constitutional mandate that the building itself be operated by the government. Legislation is just regulation.
Unless a Constitutional scholar wants to correct me . . . .
To: 1rudeboy
Under a public/private partnership, the firm is NOT private. Of course in your zeal to grow the size and influence of the federal government, you fail to acknowledge that.
138
posted on
06/03/2008 7:50:10 AM PDT
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a billionaire! Thanks WTO and the "free trade" system!--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: hedgetrimmer
I want a private company to operate a nuclear power plant. Therefore, according to you, I'm growing the size and influence of the federal goverment. Yet you are not growing the size and influence of the federal government, because you want . . . oh, that's right, you haven't stated how you want to operate the nuclear power plant. You're sitting in the dark eating hand-picked nuts and berries.
To: 1rudeboy
140
posted on
06/03/2008 12:57:24 PM PDT
by
Czar
( StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-152 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson