I love the return of the muscle car replicas of sorts. Ford's T-Bird was a nice try but a yawner. The 2005 Mustang was Grand Slam and now The Charger looks like it will follow suit.
If the US manufactures knew what was good for them they'd tap this market till the cows come home. People who buy these could care less what the price of gas is, I say bring back the 57 Chevy and go from there!
To: Clint N. Suhks
And yet another thread says the Chevy Camaro is toast.
2 posted on
05/21/2008 2:48:56 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Clint N. Suhks
If they didn’t have ridiculous price tags on them, I’d buy cars like this.
3 posted on
05/21/2008 2:50:14 PM PDT by
JamesP81
(George Orwell's 1984 was a warning, not a suggestion)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Wow. That car is seriously cool!
4 posted on
05/21/2008 2:51:24 PM PDT by
Drew68
To: Clint N. Suhks
A colleague, who writes on cars all the time and who has a new book on the history of the auto coming out, says that the best deal in the world right now is any kind of classic car.
1) It will GAIN value
2) It's easier to maintain
3) It's still cooler than any of the new "cool cars" that are out there.
I'm thinking 69 Chevy Camaro SS.
5 posted on
05/21/2008 2:51:45 PM PDT by
LS
(CNN is the Amtrak of News)
To: Clint N. Suhks
The picture reminds me of a mix between the 68 or 69 Camero and a 65 Mustang. But that’s just me.
6 posted on
05/21/2008 2:52:57 PM PDT by
GloriaJane
(http://www.download.com/gloriajane)
To: Clint N. Suhks
” I say bring back the 57 Chevy and go from there! “
When I was a kid , I actually wrote a letter to General Motors telling them they ought to bring back the 1957 Chevy ! They never replied , though . : (
10 posted on
05/21/2008 2:55:38 PM PDT by
sushiman
To: Clint N. Suhks
Glad they didn’t run that thing through a wind tunnel to make it looks like the typical cookie-cutter mobile. Looks almost exactly like the early ‘70s Challenger — the epitome of a muscle car, imo.
11 posted on
05/21/2008 2:56:29 PM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: Clint N. Suhks
More minuses:
It weighs 2 tons
It's slow
13 posted on
05/21/2008 3:00:16 PM PDT by
38special
(I mean come on.)
To: Clint N. Suhks

I think we all know that this car absolutely requires a custom General Lee paint job. It is a shame they make them any other way...
18 posted on
05/21/2008 3:06:44 PM PDT by
gridlock
(RNC.com wants you to know... It's OK to vote against Barack Obama...)
To: Clint N. Suhks
21 posted on
05/21/2008 3:10:41 PM PDT by
ETL
To: Clint N. Suhks
My brother had a 440 1970 Challenger when I was little. It did 12s. Then he dropped a rod through the side of the block. Never the same after he put a tame 383 in it.
22 posted on
05/21/2008 3:10:46 PM PDT by
Lx
((Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.))
To: Clint N. Suhks
Now, if we only had 35 cent gas like we had in 1970 to go along with that 1970 look-a-like Challenger...
24 posted on
05/21/2008 3:13:57 PM PDT by
kellynla
(Freedom of speech makes it easier to spot the idiots! Semper Fi!)
To: Clint N. Suhks
Rumor has it that this car will in 2010 come from the factory with over 600 horsepower.
Adjusts drool cup.
To: Clint N. Suhks
I think this thing looks great! I kick myself frequently for selling my old Barracuda- now I’m finding that I can’t afford a new one or an old one!
31 posted on
05/21/2008 3:31:30 PM PDT by
philled
("I prefer messy democracy to the stability of tyrants." -- Howar Ziad, Iraqi Ambassador to Canada)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson