Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Common Myths for the Macintosh
David Alison's Blog ^ | 05/06/2008 | David Alison

Posted on 05/16/2008 12:31:37 PM PDT by Swordmaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last
To: Spktyr
if you’re on a single-line entry field on a Mac (in anything other than FireFox or other program that doesn’t use the built in input handlers), such as a web browser’s address entry field, you can press the up arrow to go to the start of the line, or the down arrow to go to the end of the line. Simple. Wish Windows had it.

That's one of the little things that bugs the *&^% out of me on Windows. On a Mac, if I want to copy a URL from the address bar to paste into an e-mail or AIM, it's a piece of cake -- shift-up-arrow goes to the beginning, shift-down-arrow selects the line, and command-C copies. Windows one-line text fields also don't seem to have a consistent double- and triple-click behavior.

In fairness, there might be an equally simple way to do that in Windows, but it's not as automatic to me.

121 posted on 05/17/2008 3:51:17 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr
if you’re on a single-line entry field on a Mac (in anything other than FireFox or other program that doesn’t use the built in input handlers), such as a web browser’s address entry field, you can press the up arrow to go to the start of the line, or the down arrow to go to the end of the line. Simple. Wish Windows had it.

That's one of the little things that bugs the *&^% out of me on Windows. On a Mac, if I want to copy a URL from the address bar to paste into an e-mail or AIM, it's a piece of cake -- shift-up-arrow goes to the beginning, shift-down-arrow selects the line, and command-C copies. Windows one-line text fields also don't seem to have a consistent double- and triple-click behavior.

In fairness, there might be an equally simple way to do that in Windows, but it's not as automatic to me.

122 posted on 05/17/2008 3:51:17 PM PDT by ReignOfError
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: dangus
Oh, knock it off... A $400 PC is last year’s $1600 PC, so if last year’s model didn’t crash last year, it ain’t gonna crash this year.

That's not really true. Last year's $1600 pc used quality capacitors, power supplies and other components. This year's $400 pc has the same CPU, but the motherboard was made by some random factory in China, with electrical components from a factory that stole the electrolyte formula in the capacitors so they leak in 9 months and a power supply that can't regulate the voltage properly.

Many, if not most, Windows crashes are related to hardware problems

123 posted on 05/17/2008 3:54:59 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

Oh, and Control-Home or Control-End doesn’t work in all of *Microsoft’s* own applications. In Publisher, for example, Control-End moves you to the end of the text field (and if you’re not in a text field it either doesn’t work or PUTS you in a text field), not to the end of the document. In Access, it doesn’t move the page at all, it *immediately* takes you to the last field in the last record in the file. In PowerPoint, it works like Publisher, and it doesn’t work at ALL in Visio.


124 posted on 05/17/2008 3:55:24 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: ReignOfError

In windows, the first click selects the entire address. Otherwise, click on the address, then hit ctrl-a, ctrl-c to select all and copy.


125 posted on 05/17/2008 3:58:48 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: MediaMole

Except... it doesn’t always work that way. Depends on what version of IE you happen to be running at the time, etc., etc.


126 posted on 05/17/2008 4:00:20 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker
Way Off subject but since I have never posted and know not how I am wondering why the hell all the Ted the Swimmer threads are locked. Are we not allowed to express our joy at such a long over due gettiing what he's due?

Luigi.

I know I'm being nasty but so is that drunken slob.

:-)

127 posted on 05/17/2008 4:03:51 PM PDT by LuigiBasco (It's almost too late to restart The Crusades. (What are we waiting for))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

It consistent in IE7 and Firefox on XP.

Ctrl-a, Ctrl-c also works in Linux and Apple-a, Apple-c works on a Mac.


128 posted on 05/17/2008 4:05:50 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All

I still haven’t transferred my LDS Personal Ancestry Files over to my mac because I’m afraid I’ll screw things up making the mac run windows files. Do I use Crossover? Parallel?

What’s the best software for the PAF?

(sigh)


129 posted on 05/17/2008 4:08:13 PM PDT by getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL (****************************Stop Continental Drift**)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Well yes, I don’t care for either OS, I just care less for Macs than for my modified Windows.


130 posted on 05/17/2008 4:18:14 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: dangus
If Mac users could only just have the attitude, “Yeah, I spent an ungodly amount of dough for my computer, but isn’t it cool?”, people would like Mac users. It’s the attitude they have that all PC users are stupid, accursed, yadda yadda yadda, that’s why everyone who doesn’t use a Mac hates Mac users.

The thing is I've been a Windows user since the 286 version and I still am. When it came time to replace my main home system I decided on a Mac instead of Windows again, and I got what I believe was a good value.

What you perceive as superiority is a bunch of people who have found something much, much better and want to help others by letting them know. The only problem is most responses are full of the above myths ("ungodly amount of dough") instead of being informed.

I’ve always had at least two PCs since 1994. I’ve never spent more than $600 on one

That's hard to believe unless you were buying old, used stuff. A fairly loaded 486 cost well over $2,000 in 1994 (which was after the Pentiums came out as the high-end machines). I didn't hear about sub-$1,000 machines until the late 90s.

131 posted on 05/17/2008 4:36:49 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Eragon

It comes with a short version. The dictionary I’m talking about is the unabridged Oxford English Dictionary. It comes in 20 printed volumes or 1 CD-ROM. It Contains more of a history of the English language. They do not have a version that runs on a Mac. Seems crazy to me but c’est la vive.


132 posted on 05/17/2008 4:39:17 PM PDT by ALPAPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL

Just copy the files, then use this:

http://www.lanopalera.net/Genealogy/AboutPAWriter.html

I have written a freeware genealogy program, Personal Ancestry Writer II (PAWriter II), for the Macintosh, one version for MacOS 9.x and one for MacOS X. It combines most of the features of the LDS Personal Ancestral File program (PAF) for the Macintosh (for which all development stopped a few years ago after release 2.3.1), with additional features that generate web pages (in HTML), word processing files (in RTF for, e.g., AppleWorks) and desktop publishing files (in MML for FrameMaker). The generated report files include genealogical dictionaries, registers, ahnentafels and lineages—such as appear on this site—as well as some interesting text files and pedigree charts.


133 posted on 05/18/2008 12:53:23 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal
Or it may be that their OS version doesn't support it.

The Mac OS X dock hiding option has been available since the first beta versions were released nearly eight years ago.

134 posted on 05/18/2008 12:50:04 PM PDT by HAL9000 ("No one made you run for president, girl."- Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Yes, someone else pointed that out - and suggested that the school may have locked them, or something.

But the fact is, with their machines, if the dock is hidden and something is dragged to it, it doesn't come up and allow itself to be dropped on.

This means the dock has to be made really small to allow as much real estate as possible.

135 posted on 05/18/2008 1:24:22 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal

Thanks for jogging my memory. That Mac is probably running in “Parental Control” mode (in System Preferences/Accounts), which has a Finder checkbox option for “Modify the Dock”. That seems like a reasonable restriction for a public-access computer.


136 posted on 05/18/2008 1:41:03 PM PDT by HAL9000 ("No one made you run for president, girl."- Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
Except that it's true for most OEMs.

Very true. I knew the author wasn't speaking in absolutes and neither was I.
However, there are quite a lot of people such as myself who think nothing of planning and building their own systems to save money and get quality components.
And there are those who will purposely seek out machines that are available with no bundling in order to start with a fresh install. And those numbers have grown quite a lot in recent years. Yet there are still large numbers of 'unsophisticated' users who buy the machines with bundled crapware, as you say, because they don't know any better.
Good thing for me because I get decent money from a lot of folks to expunge this crapware and secure their machines with lean, efficient applications to guard against further exposure.

137 posted on 05/18/2008 2:22:43 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (The secret of Life is letting go. The secret of Love is letting it show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"That Mac is probably running in “Parental Control” mode (in System Preferences/Accounts), which has a Finder checkbox option for “Modify the Dock”."

Ah, thanks - I'll look for that next time and see.

138 posted on 05/18/2008 8:42:51 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Write in: Fred Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

/bingo

(multiple)


139 posted on 05/19/2008 10:42:45 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/_______________________Profile updated Monday, April 28, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver

The low end Mac is $599. It compares favorably with the low end PCs that are in its price range. And it doesn’t come with the bloatware that haunts cheap Windows machines.


140 posted on 05/23/2008 4:15:03 PM PDT by Crusher138 ("Then conquer we must, for our cause it is just")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson