To: TLI
The Ironman suit looks good.
The Raytheon deal looks like a drunk used an erector set and tin foil along with a large dose of bad taste.
I'm NOT impressed.
3 posted on
05/02/2008 6:46:38 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
This was not very impressive either but look where it went...

6 posted on
05/02/2008 6:55:40 PM PDT by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: A CA Guy
“The Ironman suit looks good.
The Raytheon deal looks like a drunk used an erector set “
The Ironman suit is not real and does not work, though. It’s a movie prop.
8 posted on
05/02/2008 6:58:33 PM PDT by
DBrow
To: A CA Guy
Prototypes are designed for functionality, rather than aesthetics. Get the thing working the way you want it to, then engineer it down.
My guess is there's another department in Raytheon, or another company for that matter, that's already working on the material for the exoskeleton.
Put the two together and you have an Iron Man suit.
19 posted on
05/02/2008 11:10:24 PM PDT by
csense
To: A CA Guy
One noisy feedback pot and it'll you break you like a toothpick.
<}B^), I think.
22 posted on
05/03/2008 6:40:14 AM PDT by
Erasmus
(Nihilism never amounted to anything.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson