Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

PC World's list of 18 features Windows should have but doesn't (and which platform(s) on which they are already available):

  1. Exposé (Mac)
  2. Virtual Workspaces (Mac, Linux, PC-BSD)
  3. Back to My Mac (Mac)
  4. Screen Sharing (Mac)
  5. Time Machine (Mac)
  6. ISO Burning (Mac, Linux, PC-BSD)
  7. Stickies Notes(Mac, Linux)
  8. Podcast Capture (Mac)
  9. Software Repositories (Linux, PC-BSD)
  10. Desktop Cube (Linux, PC-BSD)
  11. Application Dock (Mac)
  12. Automated Screen Shots (Mac)
  13. Multitouch Trackpad Gestures (Mac)
  14. Cover Flow (Mac)
  15. Pre-Installed Web Server (Mac, Linux, PC-BSD)
  16. POSIX Compliance (Mac, Linux, PC-BSD, BeOS)
  17. Standardized Menu Ribbon (Mac)
  18. Single-File Applications (Mac)

Hmmmm. Mac OSX has 16 of the 18 features on the burglar's wish list...
1 posted on 05/01/2008 5:11:26 PM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
To: Swordmaker
You could add it all easily to the successor to Windows Vista, but the hard disk space used could balloon around 20 GB. (eek!)
2 posted on 05/01/2008 5:15:08 PM PDT by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1234; 50mm; 6SJ7; Abundy; Action-America; acoulterfan; aristotleman; af_vet_rr; Aggie Mama; ...
16 of 18 features PCWorld lusts for on Windows XP and Vista are Apple Mac OS X features... PING!


Apple: the research lab for Microsoft

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

3 posted on 05/01/2008 5:15:59 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

For you Windows users, the cool thing about this article is it tells you how to implement a version of these wishes on your PC. Good read.


4 posted on 05/01/2008 5:22:52 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
The one most important feature that Microsoft has and all of the others are missing is:

*** MARKET SHARE ***

But, that's OK. Those other companies would rather play around with their widgets.
5 posted on 05/01/2008 5:23:14 PM PDT by politicket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
With a little work you can bring that up to 17.

I use macports all the time on my mac (#9 - software repositories).

macports.org

-paridel
7 posted on 05/01/2008 5:24:41 PM PDT by Paridel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Windoze already has too many features that don’t work.


9 posted on 05/01/2008 5:35:33 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

I would add built-in support for .pdfs to that list.


11 posted on 05/01/2008 5:39:19 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

The should first fix the features they have, so they work.

Especially the basic features.

For example, why do my XP and 2K machines often forget how I grouped the icons on my desktop, scrambling them all up on me?

That’s basic stuff, for Pete’s sake.


12 posted on 05/01/2008 5:40:31 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Apple owns the patents for several of those technologies, so I would not expect to see them in Windows anytime soon.


15 posted on 05/01/2008 6:10:30 PM PDT by HAL9000 ("No one made you run for president, girl."- Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Pre-Installed Web Server (Mac, Linux, PC-BSD)

A Windows web server on the home desktop. -- That will end well.

17 posted on 05/01/2008 6:14:45 PM PDT by MediaMole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
No offense, but perhaps this is why Macs have significantly penetrated the PC market - from 6% to over 17% in one year. This list simply points out what many people, frustrated but a computer OS that, other than some "bling", has remained essentially unchanged since windows 3.3.

The principle issue with addressing these items is that the underlying "guts" of Windows does not lend itself to making the sort of fundamental changes needed in order to add these features. Perhaps the days of Windows being the "only" OS used by business are coming to an end...

21 posted on 05/01/2008 6:35:15 PM PDT by GunnyB (Once a Marine, Always a Marine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker
Taking screen shots in Windows has never been as easy as it should be. Sure, it starts out simple enough: You press the Print Screen key, and the current view instantly copies to the Clipboard.

To capture just the active window/dialog box instead of the entire screen, press Alt-PrintScreen.

Where it goes from there, however, is another matter entirely. It's up to you to open up Paint or another image editor, paste the captured screen into the app window, and then save it. What a pain.

If you're taking many screenshots at one time, do this:

1. Open a blank Word/OpenOffice doc.

2. After doing Alt-PrintScreen to capture a window, CTRL-V in the doc to paste the screenshot.

3. After capturing all the screenshots, save the doc.

4. Save it again as an HTML file.

Each screenshot in the HTML file is named and saved automatically as a separate JPG. (Word also saves each image as a PNG).

This method is much faster than plopping each screenshot into an image editor as you capture it, and then naming/saving separately.

Later, you can use an image editor if you need to.

22 posted on 05/01/2008 6:44:02 PM PDT by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

ping to me for later


28 posted on 05/01/2008 7:36:18 PM PDT by PjhCPA (catchy taglines are boring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker; Golden Eagle; Bush2000; Lazamataz

That list is rubbish.

What Windows users need is:
1. seamless backwards compatibility (especially corporate users who run software written inside their own company specifically for their jobs)

2. no Registry. The Windows Registry paradigm can only *stop* a program from running...a very bad way to do business (OK, the registry file should exist to maintain backwards compatibility, but that’s it).

3. the OS *is* a firewall. Probes of ports and external signals should be logged, but only allowed when a user tells the OS via a dedicated background screen (pop-up message box “OK” clicking should banned)

4. You don’t click “Start” to shut down your OS. That’s just stupid; it makes Redmond look like a bunch of stoned college kids

5. Right clicks on *anything* should allow you to see and **change** all properties (not just listed properties...all properties down to the deepest code level) and those changes should be persistent even through reboots

6. the task bar should have a Google search window (hey, Microsoft didn’t want you to have a Microsoft search window, so Google must be a better suggestion to them)

7. Pop-Ups and message boxes (e.g. click “OK” to continue) should be banned or at least changed to have a timer that self-clicks “OK” after a pre-set amount of time so that no user is compelled to baby-sit a PC during a reboot or installation

8. the user should be able to kill every process and service, even if doing so corrupts the hard drive and turns off the power to widows and orphans

9. software installations and upgrades should be banned from forcing the user to reboot in order to use the new service

10. the user should have the option to request a “max performance” review in which the OS shows how much performance can be gained, and how many “unused/non-mandatory” services/dlls can/must be turned off (or set to a priority so low that they consume less than 1/1000th of CPU time), such that a single program is given full PC power with as little OS overhead as possible...via 1-click


33 posted on 05/01/2008 8:40:41 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

This may all be true, but I probably use about 10% of the features on my computer. This sounds like an additional 18 features I would never use.


41 posted on 05/01/2008 9:39:37 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker; rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

51 posted on 05/02/2008 5:24:47 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Adding MKS Toolkit and ActivePerl go a long way toward making Windows tolerable. :-)


52 posted on 05/02/2008 5:52:40 AM PDT by NCjim (The more I use Windows, the more I love UNIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

Windows still doesn’t do ISO burning? Wow. Does anyone know if you can create an ISO with out 3rd party tools on Windows? Unix has had that since forever. (”dd” is one of the oldest commands.)


55 posted on 05/02/2008 6:13:22 AM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

My personal pet peeve is that what people think an OS does ends up being an endless grab-bag of “features” many of dubious worth. Stickies notes being an OS function? That type of thinking is the *problem* not the solution.

The best thing any OS can do is to do what it does best (schedule processes, manage memory, manage devices, run some background processes, provide a file system) and then GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY.

Decouple the OS from the UI, the applications, the services and leave that out of kernel space. Erect a firewall between OS and applications so that a problem in an application doesn’t bring down the whole box.

Certainly in the microsoft world, the trend has been the exact opposite. Exhibit A, the integration of the browser with the OS.

This is exactly the wrong approach, IMHO.


59 posted on 05/02/2008 6:58:08 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Swordmaker

I’ve tried six+ virtual workspace managers for MS Windows, including the one MS offers via its add-on tools site. They all have problems, but there is one I can recommend.

VirtuaWin: http://virtuawin.sourceforge.net/

I’ve had it set up for 12 workspaces on some machines, right now I’m using 4. It has the most working features and works the least quirkily of them all.


64 posted on 05/02/2008 8:17:52 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson