Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

18 Features Windows Should Have (but Doesn't)
PCWorld Magazine ^ | Monday, April 28, 2008 10:00 PM PDT | Robert Strohmeyer, PC World

Posted on 05/01/2008 5:11:26 PM PDT by Swordmaker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last
To: discostu
Computing isn’t supposed to make work easier, I mean sure that was the big lie the industry used to sell them in the 80s, but it was a lie and some parts of the industry are finally starting to admit it. The only people whose work is made easier by computers are the spreadsheet commandos that analyze a business’ various statistics, everybody else does more work to feed the data into those spreadsheets. Of course it’s too late, the computers are entrenched

Yes, bingo!

I explained to some IT pros in my family, that I often feel using a PC for business, is like using a pliers and screwdriver to tie your shoelaces.

Your old fashioned hands, as in "manual," work better.

What's more, as a businessman I've learned that the best computers are people.

Beguile them, and they will do half your job for you for free.

121 posted on 05/02/2008 7:31:15 PM PDT by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Shryke

You can control pretty much anything. For $1,000 you can get unlimited Remote Desktop. No, nothing like RD in Windows. You get screen sharing including a curtain mode so users don’t see what you’re doing, and a whole lot more. Basically, between OS X and Remote Desktop you get the ability of Windows, SCOM, Norton Ghost, and a whole lot more. I suggest looking at Apple’s web site for the whole list of features for client management, including software and update pushes and client hardware and software monitoring. You can even do net boot with custom images for different groups.


122 posted on 05/02/2008 7:36:07 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

It was funny, since you seem to be attacking Microsoft for simply making the feature available. Claiming that Apache is better because it’s harder to setup! Even the parent article got it wrong that a personal web server isn’t available on Windows. Typical for these threads.


123 posted on 05/02/2008 7:38:19 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason

I wonder if your desk is too vibraty. On my desk at home I use a keyboard tray and I know my mouse will twitch around a lot while I’m doing keyboard stuff. Some boxes don’t bother to implement the cursor disappear thing, the OS option is just step one the application guys also have to tell the OS when the user is typing, like it doesn’t look like FireFox has bothered. But if you’ve got it disappearing sometimes and not others it could be something making the mouse twitch while you type.

Good luck.


124 posted on 05/03/2008 7:39:21 AM PDT by discostu (down in the swamps with the gators and flamingos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

I’ve looked - not very detailed where I was. What about diverting the user’s local files to a network share, invisibly? Distributed/replicated file shares across the various offices, automatically?


125 posted on 05/03/2008 8:13:55 AM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
What about diverting the user’s local files to a network share, invisibly?

This is UNIX, it was invented with things like that in mind. If you use X11 you don't even know where a program is being run from. Netboot will even make your client effectively a diskless terminal if you want to be able to centrally manage all your images on the server instead of pushing them out.

126 posted on 05/03/2008 2:57:24 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

You didn’t quite answer my question (I am not a UNIX expert). Can you divert the desktop and all saved files to a network server? Invisibly? Netbooting has nothing to do with that (jesus, do people actually do that outside of a SAN?).


127 posted on 05/03/2008 3:21:58 PM PDT by Shryke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Shryke
You didn’t quite answer my question (I am not a UNIX expert). Can you divert the desktop and all saved files to a network server? Invisibly?

Yes. In UNIX, a user never needs to know where his files are. As I said, with X11 (which OS X ships with but isn't used by default) you don't even know where your programs are being run from. Every instance of everybody's word processor could be actually running on a server and they wouldn't even know it.

That's how UNIX is, totally networked long before NT was a twinkle in Gates' eye.

128 posted on 05/03/2008 3:37:18 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat
In UNIX, a user never needs to know where his files are.

ROFL

129 posted on 05/03/2008 5:29:23 PM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

GFY LMTFA


130 posted on 05/03/2008 6:02:22 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
It the interest of full disclosure, I also liked REXX, which a lot of people think is a little weird.

REXX rocked. It was included in IBMDos 7, (and OS/2 of course) and was as powerful a scripting tool as you'd want back in the day. What I thought was great was that you could write a Rexx script that would run on a PC, and would run unmodified on a mainframe as well.

 

131 posted on 07/29/2008 10:57:24 AM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

It ticked me off to no end that MS included a REXX (Regina) interpreter with NT4, but not W2K.


132 posted on 07/29/2008 10:59:47 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

FRTrollBlocker saves the day again!


133 posted on 07/29/2008 11:05:12 AM PDT by zeugma (Mark Steyn For Global Dictator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson