No matter how you slice up my words, or pull the middle of a sentence out to distort it, the truth still remains true. On any issue that you have a problem with John McCain, you will have a worse problem with Clinton or Obama. There is no mathematics left as far as who the GOP nominee is going to be. John McCain has a majority of pledged delegates. All the nutsy Ron Paul games in the world won't change that.
Just for grins, here's a slice and dice on your own words.
roamer_1: Yes... I ... like many ... socialist ... position. (Just havin' fun.)
Oh, I cry BS on that accusation. The only thing that I can see for you to complain about is this bit:
[...] [I]f you have a problem with McCain's position then you should vote for him [...]
...Which is not out of context at all. It says precisely what is stated. I purposefully split the sentence down to it's barest form to show you how silly it is.
On any issue that you have a problem with John McCain, you will have a worse problem with Clinton or Obama.
As I had asked once before:
According to whom?
There is no mathematics left as far as who the GOP nominee is going to be. John McCain has a majority of pledged delegates. All the nutsy Ron Paul games in the world won't change that.
Again, what you said was this:
Go ahead and vote for Clinton/Obama by writing in some fantasy candidate if you want [...]
A vote for anyone other than Clinton/Obama is *not* a vote for Clinton/Obama. That's that math thing going on, see. It only counts for Clinton/Obama if the vote actually goes in their column.
And I never said that McCain was not going to be the GOP nominee. I said there would be a Conservative on the ballot. I did not say that Conservative would be a Republican, which would be patently absurd. Everyone knows that McCain is a liberal, Just like his Democrat opponent will be.