Oh, I cry BS on that accusation. The only thing that I can see for you to complain about is this bit:
[...] [I]f you have a problem with McCain's position then you should vote for him [...]
...Which is not out of context at all. It says precisely what is stated. I purposefully split the sentence down to it's barest form to show you how silly it is.
On any issue that you have a problem with John McCain, you will have a worse problem with Clinton or Obama.
As I had asked once before:
According to whom?
There is no mathematics left as far as who the GOP nominee is going to be. John McCain has a majority of pledged delegates. All the nutsy Ron Paul games in the world won't change that.
Again, what you said was this:
Go ahead and vote for Clinton/Obama by writing in some fantasy candidate if you want [...]
A vote for anyone other than Clinton/Obama is *not* a vote for Clinton/Obama. That's that math thing going on, see. It only counts for Clinton/Obama if the vote actually goes in their column.
And I never said that McCain was not going to be the GOP nominee. I said there would be a Conservative on the ballot. I did not say that Conservative would be a Republican, which would be patently absurd. Everyone knows that McCain is a liberal, Just like his Democrat opponent will be.
Only McCain and the Democrat candidate will be in the race. Any others will just be vanity candidates hanging on the sidelines.
If your goal is for MORE conservative government, then McCain is the only vote you can cast to help get that. Don’t like it? Tough cr@pola. Welcome to a democratic Republic.
If you want to make a statement, rather than helping more conservative government get in office? Vote for whoever the hanger-on tin foil candidate of your choice happens to be. They may be on the ballot but THEY AREN’T IN THE RACE.