Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The last charge (Knights Templar are back...)
The Guardian (U.K.) ^ | 3-19-08 | Patrick Barkham

Posted on 03/19/2008 8:30:19 AM PDT by Renfield

Almost 700 years after the Pope burned their leader at the stake, the Knights Templar are back. Or are they? Patrick Barkham tries to find out why the long-vanished order of Crusaders might suddenly be advertising in the press....

~~~snip~~~

Apart from the odd misplaced apostrophe and various arcane references to "annulling the bull", the advert gravely announced that the Knights Templar would petition the Pope to "restore the Order with the duties, rights and privileges appropriate to the 21st century and beyond". It called on all Templar groups and "brothers in arms" around the world to get in touch, either via its website, www.theknightstemplar.info, or an address in west London, which could clearly become a mecca for long-lost Templars and baffled Telegraph readers alike....

(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...


TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: catholics; godsgravesglyphs; knightstemplar; papacy; pope; templars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 03/19/2008 8:30:20 AM PDT by Renfield
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam; SunkenCiv

Any interest in the Knights Templar?


2 posted on 03/19/2008 8:30:46 AM PDT by Renfield (Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

You might want to talk to Tom Hanks.........


3 posted on 03/19/2008 8:31:27 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Is this tagline governed by McCain-Feingold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Anyone who claims to be a Knight Templar today is a member of a secret society and is, if Catholic, under a latae sententiae excommunication which can be rescinded only if they renounce their membership in the secret society.
4 posted on 03/19/2008 8:34:07 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
which could clearly become a mecca for long-lost Templars

Mecca? Jerusalem perhaps, never Mecca.

5 posted on 03/19/2008 8:40:00 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
under a latae sententiae excommunication - what are the chances the Pope would rescind this?
6 posted on 03/19/2008 8:43:51 AM PDT by SF Republican (Conservatives wanted all or nothing, and they got it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Renfield
Another possible worm is the reaction that the restoration of the Templars would cause among some Islamic groups who associate the Templars with the Crusades.

That's precisely why this should be seriously considered. A big f-you to the "Crusades for we, not for thee" Jihadis.

7 posted on 03/19/2008 8:46:25 AM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Republican
what are the chances the Pope would rescind this?

Without renunciation of membership in the secret society, none. This particular excommunication is reserved to the local ordinary, usually.

8 posted on 03/19/2008 8:48:08 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: uglybiker

They’re putting the band back together again.


9 posted on 03/19/2008 9:16:23 AM PDT by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shuckmaster; Renfield
I'm still looking for proof that ANY group calling itself 'Kights Templar' (Masons included) are descended from the originals.
10 posted on 03/19/2008 10:35:55 AM PDT by uglybiker (I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Renfield

· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Thanks Renfield. Just adding to the catalog, not sending a general distribution. An "Oh So Mysteriouso" topic.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are Blam, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

· Google · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology magazine · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


11 posted on 03/19/2008 11:12:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Ah yes....excommunication. Isn't that where mortal men tell God who He's allowed to talk to?

L

12 posted on 03/19/2008 11:22:36 AM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Isn't that where mortal men tell God who He's allowed to talk to?

Your post essentially reads: "Wideawake, I have no idea what the word 'excommunication' means. Can you explain it to me?"

Well, Lurker, I'd be happy to.

Excommunication means that Church recognizes that one of its members has committed a sin of the kind that merits the sinner's exclusion from the sacraments it administers.

13 posted on 03/19/2008 11:27:46 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Excommunication means that Church recognizes that one of its members has committed a sin of the kind that merits the sinner's exclusion from the sacraments it administers.

Oh gee, thanks.

So in other words as far as God is concerned, it doesn't mean squat.

Thanks for clearing that up.

L

14 posted on 03/19/2008 12:06:38 PM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
So in other words as far as God is concerned, it doesn't mean squat.

Except for the fact that He, in the person of the Holy Spirit, guides the Church and commands obedience to its precepts.

15 posted on 03/19/2008 12:11:41 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
Except for the fact that He, in the person of the Holy Spirit, guides the Church

The Pope is God? Who knew?

L

16 posted on 03/19/2008 12:12:25 PM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The Pope is God? Who knew?

What your post actually says is: "Wideawake, I've read the New Testament, but I'm a little confused. Was Jesus God or was Peter God? I can't remember, can you tell me?"

Again, Lurker, I'd be happy to.

Jesus was God, and Peter was a mortal man that Jesus selected to perform certain tasks on His behalf.

17 posted on 03/19/2008 12:21:44 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
What your post actually says, and I quote, is this:

Except for the fact that He, in the person of the Holy Spirit, guides the Church

So your position is that Jesus is running the Catholic Church?

Do I have that about right?

L

18 posted on 03/19/2008 12:27:45 PM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
So your position is that Jesus is running the Catholic Church?

Insofar as jesus is the Son of God and the Son and Holy Spirit are one, He is guiding the Church - not administrating it.

"Running" is too vague a term since it could mean either.

19 posted on 03/19/2008 12:39:20 PM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
"Running" is too vague a term since it could mean either.

Did Jesus 'excommunicate' the Knights Templar or did the Pope do it?

L

20 posted on 03/19/2008 1:03:46 PM PDT by Lurker (Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson