Skip to comments.
The last charge (Knights Templar are back...)
The Guardian (U.K.) ^
| 3-19-08
| Patrick Barkham
Posted on 03/19/2008 8:30:19 AM PDT by Renfield
Almost 700 years after the Pope burned their leader at the stake, the Knights Templar are back. Or are they? Patrick Barkham tries to find out why the long-vanished order of Crusaders might suddenly be advertising in the press....
~~~snip~~~
Apart from the odd misplaced apostrophe and various arcane references to "annulling the bull", the advert gravely announced that the Knights Templar would petition the Pope to "restore the Order with the duties, rights and privileges appropriate to the 21st century and beyond". It called on all Templar groups and "brothers in arms" around the world to get in touch, either via its website, www.theknightstemplar.info, or an address in west London, which could clearly become a mecca for long-lost Templars and baffled Telegraph readers alike....
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
TOPICS: History; Miscellaneous; Religion
KEYWORDS: catholics; godsgravesglyphs; knightstemplar; papacy; pope; templars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
03/19/2008 8:30:20 AM PDT
by
Renfield
To: blam; SunkenCiv
Any interest in the Knights Templar?
2
posted on
03/19/2008 8:30:46 AM PDT
by
Renfield
(Turning apples into venison since 1999!)
To: Renfield
You might want to talk to Tom Hanks.........
3
posted on
03/19/2008 8:31:27 AM PDT
by
TexasNative2000
(Is this tagline governed by McCain-Feingold?)
To: Renfield
Anyone who claims to be a Knight Templar today is a member of a secret society and is, if Catholic, under a latae sententiae excommunication which can be rescinded only if they renounce their membership in the secret society.
4
posted on
03/19/2008 8:34:07 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: Renfield
which could clearly become a mecca for long-lost Templars Mecca? Jerusalem perhaps, never Mecca.
5
posted on
03/19/2008 8:40:00 AM PDT
by
Dixie Yooper
(Ephesians 6:11)
To: wideawake
under a latae sententiae excommunication - what are the chances the Pope would rescind this?
6
posted on
03/19/2008 8:43:51 AM PDT
by
SF Republican
(Conservatives wanted all or nothing, and they got it.)
To: Renfield
Another possible worm is the reaction that the restoration of the Templars would cause among some Islamic groups who associate the Templars with the Crusades.That's precisely why this should be seriously considered. A big f-you to the "Crusades for we, not for thee" Jihadis.
7
posted on
03/19/2008 8:46:25 AM PDT
by
Dr.Deth
To: SF Republican
what are the chances the Pope would rescind this?Without renunciation of membership in the secret society, none. This particular excommunication is reserved to the local ordinary, usually.
8
posted on
03/19/2008 8:48:08 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: uglybiker
They’re putting the band back together again.
To: shuckmaster; Renfield
I'm still looking for proof that ANY group calling itself 'Kights Templar' (Masons included) are descended from the originals.
10
posted on
03/19/2008 10:35:55 AM PDT
by
uglybiker
(I do not suffer from mental illness. I quite enjoy it, actually.)
To: Renfield
11
posted on
03/19/2008 11:12:23 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/______________________Profile updated Saturday, March 1, 2008)
To: wideawake
Ah yes....excommunication. Isn't that where mortal men tell God who He's allowed to talk to?
L
12
posted on
03/19/2008 11:22:36 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
To: Lurker
Isn't that where mortal men tell God who He's allowed to talk to?Your post essentially reads: "Wideawake, I have no idea what the word 'excommunication' means. Can you explain it to me?"
Well, Lurker, I'd be happy to.
Excommunication means that Church recognizes that one of its members has committed a sin of the kind that merits the sinner's exclusion from the sacraments it administers.
13
posted on
03/19/2008 11:27:46 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
Excommunication means that Church recognizes that one of its members has committed a sin of the kind that merits the sinner's exclusion from the sacraments it administers. Oh gee, thanks.
So in other words as far as God is concerned, it doesn't mean squat.
Thanks for clearing that up.
L
14
posted on
03/19/2008 12:06:38 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
To: Lurker
So in other words as far as God is concerned, it doesn't mean squat.Except for the fact that He, in the person of the Holy Spirit, guides the Church and commands obedience to its precepts.
15
posted on
03/19/2008 12:11:41 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
Except for the fact that He, in the person of the Holy Spirit, guides the Church The Pope is God? Who knew?
L
16
posted on
03/19/2008 12:12:25 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
To: Lurker
The Pope is God? Who knew? What your post actually says is: "Wideawake, I've read the New Testament, but I'm a little confused. Was Jesus God or was Peter God? I can't remember, can you tell me?"
Again, Lurker, I'd be happy to.
Jesus was God, and Peter was a mortal man that Jesus selected to perform certain tasks on His behalf.
17
posted on
03/19/2008 12:21:44 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
What your post actually says, and I quote, is this:
Except for the fact that He, in the person of the Holy Spirit, guides the Church
So your position is that Jesus is running the Catholic Church?
Do I have that about right?
L
18
posted on
03/19/2008 12:27:45 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
To: Lurker
So your position is that Jesus is running the Catholic Church?Insofar as jesus is the Son of God and the Son and Holy Spirit are one, He is guiding the Church - not administrating it.
"Running" is too vague a term since it could mean either.
19
posted on
03/19/2008 12:39:20 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(Why is it that those who call themselves Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
To: wideawake
"Running" is too vague a term since it could mean either. Did Jesus 'excommunicate' the Knights Templar or did the Pope do it?
L
20
posted on
03/19/2008 1:03:46 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Pimping my blog: http://lurkerslair-lurker.blogspot.com/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson