Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

EADS/Northrop upsets Boeing in Air Force tanker competition — analyst
Seattle Times ^ | February 29, 2008 | Dominic Gates

Posted on 02/29/2008 1:53:16 PM PST by skeptoid

Boeing has lost the long-awaited and lucrative Air Force refueling tanker contract to a competing bid based on an Airbus airplane, a respected and well-connected defense analyst close to the Air Force tanker deal said Friday.

Loren Thompson, an analyst with the Lexington Institute, cited "100 percent reliable" government sources for his information.

(Excerpt) Read more at seattletimes.nwsource.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: aerospace; boeing; defensecontractors; tanker; usaf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: af_vet_rr

If this turns out like the other foreign deals then they won’t see any production for a long time. I bet the first prototypes will be completely finished out in France and tested here...


61 posted on 03/01/2008 6:46:07 AM PST by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

“adding several thousand jobs to my state”

Don’t bet on it. Just hope for it.


62 posted on 03/01/2008 6:49:45 AM PST by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Today the Dollar to Euro is 0.6592.


63 posted on 03/01/2008 6:51:25 AM PST by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

“I hope they do. Major defense items should be American made through and through, with American suppliers. “

Amen while gives 58% of the Project to US Citizens It Must be 100%.


64 posted on 03/01/2008 9:04:52 AM PST by NoLibZone (If the Clinton years were so great for the libs- why is Obama doing so well?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: e_castillo

So the old a weak dollar mean absolutely NOTHING!

Where can I buy a US mad Toaster,Microwave,TV or Printer?

Not merely assembled here but made here.


65 posted on 03/01/2008 9:12:00 AM PST by NoLibZone (At the age of 50 - The Offshoring of US Military Projects Has Changed my perscpective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

“Amen while gives 58% of the Project to US Citizens It Must be 100%.”

It doesn’t even give nearly that much. Most of the plane’s parts will be fabricated in Europe. It’ll just be assembled in Alabama at the last stage. This is nothing but a re-badging of an Airbus with Northrop Grumman’s name to make it more palatable to Congress.


66 posted on 03/01/2008 11:13:56 AM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

“The US101 airframe is the best medium lift helicopter in the world. And quite frankly Sikorsky does not have the intellectual bandwidth to integrate the complex systems that need to go into the Presidents new transport. They are an airframer, not an integrator.”

That’s the most convoluted bullsh*t I’ve read all day. Marine One is nothing but a helicopter with some extra electronics for the President. It’s not the Space Shuttle or something.


67 posted on 03/01/2008 11:16:39 AM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
"The KC-30 industrial team is committed to delivering an American military aircraft program, with tanker assembly and production taking place in Mobile, Alabama, and 58 percent of the aircraft, subsystems and support being provided by hundreds of American partners and suppliers. The KC-30 program will result in the in-sourcing of thousands of U.S aerospace jobs." http://www.northropgrumman.com/kc30/operations/section.html
68 posted on 03/01/2008 11:43:06 AM PST by NoLibZone (At the age of 50 - The Offshoring of US Military Projects Has Changed my perscpective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

“So the old a weak dollar mean absolutely NOTHING!”

Not to the Air Force it doesn’t. The Boeing Aircraft is $35 million dollars cheaper than the Airbus. They do mention that the Airbus can carry more payload but of course that “depends on configuration”.

In the end they won’t get the promised jobs in Mobile and Airbus gets to save the A330 line for a few more years maybe even decades because this contract could be worth $100 billion at the end of it’s life.


69 posted on 03/01/2008 12:14:17 PM PST by e_castillo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I don’t believe those figures for a second. Outside analysts say that the plane will be largely fabricated in European factories.

I’m angry at the Air Force leadership for this. Angry as hell. I’d like to know what the Democrats are going to say about it. Because opposition to this stinker of a deal could win them a lot of swing support.


70 posted on 03/01/2008 12:25:49 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp

If we don’t think Oamas staffers read posts here we are dreaming.

All Riley has done is to give Huessin a H U G E set of issues with which to clobber the GOP.

So future offshore Military projects will now be used to deliver my sons to the battlefield to fight muslims.

NOT ON MY WATCH.


71 posted on 03/01/2008 12:30:59 PM PST by NoLibZone (At the age of 50 - The Offshoring of US Military Projects Has Changed my perscpective.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: dartuser
I disagree

S92 development

just search that site for eh 101 and s92, nick lappos is the head designer of the s92.
72 posted on 03/03/2008 5:30:18 PM PST by a_chronic_whiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
Marine One is nothing but a helicopter with some extra electronics for the President. It’s not the Space Shuttle or something.

Thank you ... that was my point. And that is why Sikorsky lost the contract, because that is what they proposed for a solution ... nothing but a helicopter with some electronics.

73 posted on 03/08/2008 10:43:33 AM PST by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

Fine, head designer for the S92 acknowledged ... but still second place for a reason.


74 posted on 03/08/2008 11:09:21 AM PST by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: dartuser

politics most likely. You’d have to search more on that site to find out why, EH 101 is nothing like airbus’s A330. Look up who has sold more commercial orders, safety records of the two aircraft, maintenance etc. and decide for yourself.


75 posted on 03/08/2008 7:29:33 PM PST by a_chronic_whiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: a_chronic_whiner

Why is every win that is not the status quo attributable to politics? LM won the Presidential Helo program by proposing a better solution AND by demonstrating a track record of performance on other complex integration jobs; namely, the MH-60 integration and the continued successes on the Merlin 101 integration. If the Marine One bird was just an airframe with a couple gadgets stuffed in it so the President could make a phone call then Sikorsky would have held that contract.

It didn’t matter to me who won it because I own stock in both companies ... but let’s give credit where credit is due.


76 posted on 03/10/2008 6:04:40 AM PDT by dartuser ("If you torture the data long enough, it will confess, even to crimes it did not commit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson