Skip to comments.
Electron Filmed for First Time
Livescience.com via yahoo ^
| 2/25/08
| Livescience.com
Posted on 02/25/2008 10:54:25 AM PST by thefactor
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
of course i do not understand the implications for this, but i know it's pretty cool stuff.
what would be the practical implications for this type of technology?
1
posted on
02/25/2008 10:54:26 AM PST
by
thefactor
To: Admin Moderator
please change the title to read “Electron” please. duh!
2
posted on
02/25/2008 10:55:19 AM PST
by
thefactor
(the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
To: thefactor
an electron to circle the nucleus
Do they really orbit the nucleus? I thought it was more of a probabilistic buzzing.
3
posted on
02/25/2008 10:56:49 AM PST
by
DManA
To: thefactor
One atom told the other “I just lost an electron”.
The second atom said “Are you sure?”
The first atom replied, “Yeah, I’m positive.”
4
posted on
02/25/2008 10:57:19 AM PST
by
VRWCmember
(McCain 2008 - If it's inevitable, you might as well lay back and try to enjoy it.)
To: DManA
i do not think it is a set orbit like the planets around the sun, but the space is so small i do not think it would be hard to find one and film its movements. of course, the last chemistry i took was in high school.
5
posted on
02/25/2008 11:00:06 AM PST
by
thefactor
(the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
To: thefactor
>what would be the practical implications for this type of technology?
When electrons know
that they're going to be filmed
they will start dressing
in skimpy clothing
and dancing hot and sexy.
It's just another
example of how
media-centric living
corrupts every where.
To: thefactor
Immediately after making it’s first appearance on film the Electron went on a drug and alcohol fueled bender in Beverly Hills and was sent to rehab several times before being committed.
7
posted on
02/25/2008 11:04:20 AM PST
by
CrimsonDynamo
(Where on Earth is Titanium Man?)
To: thefactor
8
posted on
02/25/2008 11:08:44 AM PST
by
ElkGroveDan
(When you choose the lesser of two evils, you still have evil.)
To: thefactor; neverdem; SunkenCiv
9
posted on
02/25/2008 11:09:04 AM PST
by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
To: thefactor; Physicist; neverdem
This sounds fascinating, and maybe we can get some knowledgeable types in here. Nobody jump on my ignorance, but what (if anything) does this mean for the uncertainty principle?
10
posted on
02/25/2008 11:11:47 AM PST
by
xJones
To: ElkGroveDan
Perhaps I didn’t see the electron but if I did, it looks like accreation rings.
Are the accreations smaller particles yet?
11
posted on
02/25/2008 11:14:28 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Never say never (there'll be a VP you'll like))
To: thefactor
Thanks for the news and thread. I love science data, and the faster and smaller and more far-out the data the better.
I would assume that a photograph of an electron would crash the wave function, then a attosecond later it would be a wave again. Would this work out in the “real world” aspects of wave/particle theory?
12
posted on
02/25/2008 11:22:58 AM PST
by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
To: thefactor
What’s the shutter speed for that?
13
posted on
02/25/2008 11:45:20 AM PST
by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: SampleMan
i’m not sure. probably taken from a young japanese girls camera phone.
14
posted on
02/25/2008 11:59:03 AM PST
by
thefactor
(the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
To: ElkGroveDan
wow, that was :30 i'll never get back.
actually it looks cool but what the heck is it? looks like an alien space cloud from an early star trek episode.
15
posted on
02/25/2008 12:00:10 PM PST
by
thefactor
(the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
To: thefactor
An attosecond is 10-18 seconds long... That's "ten to the negative 18th power", to clarify. ;)
16
posted on
02/25/2008 12:04:04 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: Mr. Jeeves
i saw that and just skipped over it. i knew i was missing something. guess they don’t have superscript. thanks!
17
posted on
02/25/2008 12:06:44 PM PST
by
thefactor
(the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
To: thefactor
The next thing will be electro-porn.
To: thefactor
The title is no more true now than when the article was posted before.
19
posted on
02/25/2008 12:34:13 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
To: HoustonTech
"SPRING BREAK ELECTRONS GONE WILD!"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson