of course i do not understand the implications for this, but i know it's pretty cool stuff.
what would be the practical implications for this type of technology?
1 posted on
02/25/2008 10:54:26 AM PST by
thefactor
To: Admin Moderator
please change the title to read “Electron” please. duh!
2 posted on
02/25/2008 10:55:19 AM PST by
thefactor
(the innocent shall not suffer nor the guilty go free...)
To: thefactor
an electron to circle the nucleus
Do they really orbit the nucleus? I thought it was more of a probabilistic buzzing.
3 posted on
02/25/2008 10:56:49 AM PST by
DManA
To: thefactor
One atom told the other “I just lost an electron”.
The second atom said “Are you sure?”
The first atom replied, “Yeah, I’m positive.”
4 posted on
02/25/2008 10:57:19 AM PST by
VRWCmember
(McCain 2008 - If it's inevitable, you might as well lay back and try to enjoy it.)
To: thefactor
>what would be the practical implications for this type of technology?
When electrons know
that they're going to be filmed
they will start dressing
in skimpy clothing
and dancing hot and sexy.
It's just another
example of how
media-centric living
corrupts every where.
To: thefactor
8 posted on
02/25/2008 11:08:44 AM PST by
ElkGroveDan
(When you choose the lesser of two evils, you still have evil.)
To: thefactor; neverdem; SunkenCiv
9 posted on
02/25/2008 11:09:04 AM PST by
Ultra Sonic 007
(Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
To: thefactor; Physicist; neverdem
This sounds fascinating, and maybe we can get some knowledgeable types in here. Nobody jump on my ignorance, but what (if anything) does this mean for the uncertainty principle?
10 posted on
02/25/2008 11:11:47 AM PST by
xJones
To: thefactor
Thanks for the news and thread. I love science data, and the faster and smaller and more far-out the data the better.
I would assume that a photograph of an electron would crash the wave function, then a attosecond later it would be a wave again. Would this work out in the “real world” aspects of wave/particle theory?
12 posted on
02/25/2008 11:22:58 AM PST by
BlueStateBlues
(Blue State for business, Red State at heart..)
To: thefactor
What’s the shutter speed for that?
13 posted on
02/25/2008 11:45:20 AM PST by
SampleMan
(We are a free and industrious people, socialist nannies do not become us.)
To: thefactor
An attosecond is 10-18 seconds long... That's "ten to the negative 18th power", to clarify. ;)
16 posted on
02/25/2008 12:04:04 PM PST by
Mr. Jeeves
("Wise men don't need to debate; men who need to debate are not wise." -- Tao Te Ching)
To: thefactor
The next thing will be electro-porn.
To: thefactor
The title is no more true now than when the article was posted before.
19 posted on
02/25/2008 12:34:13 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson