Posted on 02/07/2008 4:18:27 PM PST by wagglebee
C’mon, while I was standing behind Romney I saw Duncan Hunter supporters bashing the guy. I know it may not sound strange but these Duncan Hunter supporters were bashing him as recently as earlier this week. Too many conservatives stood behind their guy long after he dropped out
You can blame this situation on the Hucksters, because he is the one that collaborated with McCain, when he had no prayer of getting this far on his own.
How did the RNC play any role in those campaigns at all? Be specific.
The RNC does not contribute a dime to any candidate before the convention selects a nominee.
The common theme at this forum is that the Republican Establishment, whatever the hell that is, imposed this result.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Anyone was free to file, raise money and campaign. Many did.
Voters made their choices, not at the gunpoint of the RNC or the Republican Establishment, again whatever the hell that is.
I need some flesh put on the bones of this common assertion that McCain was foisted on us. What specifically happened, or is it just too convenient to blame all this on a boogeyman?
When you were standing behind Romney, you saw CONSERVATIVES bashing a LIBERAL.
I thought about bringing up the Hucksters, but there just aren’t that many of them around here. Same with the Paulistinians, they make a lot of noise, but in the end most of them are either too stoned or not old enough to go out and vote.
If John Insane is elected president I do not believe his cancer will allow him to serve a full four years ... stress seems to help cancer in its virulence. The Veep will be very important for a Mc’Cane’ term.
What, besides Romeny’s proclaimed conversions, is evidence that he was conservative. Rush and Levin jumped the shark. It might as well have been Rudy they supported.
McInsane has always been good at giving "reach-arounds" to the Donkeys.
Cheers!
Yes, I saw conservatives bashing the last man standing that could have defeated McCain and you are right... they were conservatives bashing Romney so let's not blame McCain supporters.
Beats the hell out of me! He did more to advance LIBERALISM in Massachusetts of all places than any 'Rat ever dreamed possible.
I've heard of DU but not WA...?
Does it stand for "Wikipedia Anonymous" ?
Cheers!
I'm not blaming them, it's the Rooty Rooters and Romneyites that brought this on.
Are you kidding? You just haven’t been on the same threads that I have. The Hucksters predominate this web site and they are largely to blame for giving us McCain.
It’s mainly made up of FRiberals who played with the bug zapper for too long.
No, it’s your fault and others like you who didn’t support the only conservative candidate left in the race who could have defeated RINOs McCain and Huckabee.
You fell for the spin that Romney is a RINO. Now you’re stuck with a true RINO: McCain.
Yep, socialized medicine and homosexual marriage are certainly the traits of a conservative.
...but I'd be wrong. Have at it! LOL!
I can't join you for the moment because I'm still trying to figure out how it came to be the slate we're looking at. Hillary yes - she's been after the office since her egg cracked in the pterodactyl nest. But Hussein Obama and John McCain? What weird and hideous alignment of the stars brought these two characters out of obscurity? Could it be a conspiracy by the world's most incompetent drunken cabal? Did Soros make a few phone calls while still under the dentist's nitrous oxide?
When you think about it, Hussein's the only one of the three who hasn't been met with screams by the roots of the respective parties, and only because he's such a complete tabula rasa that anyone can project anything onto his deliberately enigmatic image. You want foreign aid to yak milk fermenters in Mongolia? He's for it! Well, he didn't actually say he's for it, but he said something that might have meant something like it. Thus the glittering staircase to the very summit of power.
One despairs sometimes that those seeking office are (naturally enough) the ones who want it, not the ones we want in it. Frankly politicians make poor leaders and only marginally competent representatives anyway, and then only insofar as it keeps someone else from displacing their prime spot at the teat of the body politic. A Churchill, Reagan, Lincoln or Thatcher comes along but once in a very long time and those of us who are privileged to share a historical moment with them are doomed to disappointment by the general run of the crop. We can hope for better, we can demand better, but until we actually reward better we're going to continue to get what we have.
Me, I'm going home and opening a beer. That has been the rational response to politics from time immemorial, and I'm thinking Og the Caveman may have had it right.
And Obama is much more dangerous than Hillery.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.