1 posted on
02/01/2008 4:38:31 PM PST by
maddog55
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: maddog55
To: maddog55
To: maddog55
4 posted on
02/01/2008 4:41:19 PM PST by
Filo
(Darwin was right!)
To: maddog55
5 posted on
02/01/2008 4:41:47 PM PST by
Petronski
(I didn't leave the GOP. The GOP left me.)
To: maddog55
6 posted on
02/01/2008 4:42:10 PM PST by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: maddog55
Not even in the top five.
7 posted on
02/01/2008 4:42:10 PM PST by
Doohickey
(Giuliani: Brokeback Republican)
To: maddog55
8 posted on
02/01/2008 4:42:20 PM PST by
Shortwave
(Science is best used to slow down GOREBAL Warning than Global Warming.)
To: maddog55
No, but he may be the best to ever get bested cheating, along with the rest of the organization.
9 posted on
02/01/2008 4:42:32 PM PST by
BUSHdude2000
(Get the embedded reporters out of Iraq and finish the job)
To: maddog55
Why isn’t this in Breaking News?
10 posted on
02/01/2008 4:42:53 PM PST by
Old Sarge
(CTHULHU '08 - I won't settle for a lesser evil any longer!)
To: maddog55
Dan Marino, Fran Tarkington, Terry Bradshaw, Bart Starr, Joe Montana, Johnny Unitas, Bob Greise, Roger Starbach, Troy Aikman, Ken Stabler, Joe Namath, John Elway, even Sonny Jurgenson and Bret Farve might all have a say about that!
12 posted on
02/01/2008 4:43:41 PM PST by
meandog
(Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 333 and counting! <b>Vote Mitt=Get Billary!))
To: maddog55
By what criteria (other than people’s opinions) is one QB “the best”?
13 posted on
02/01/2008 4:44:49 PM PST by
tips up
To: maddog55
16 posted on
02/01/2008 4:46:20 PM PST by
libbylu
(Mitten I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR MCCAIN OR HUCK..THEY CALLED ME RACIST/BIGOT)
To: maddog55
On field, maybe. Off field NFW!
17 posted on
02/01/2008 4:47:38 PM PST by
rocksblues
(Polls are just a Liberal way to upset Conservatives!)
To: maddog55
No. That would be this guy:
18 posted on
02/01/2008 4:48:11 PM PST by
LouD
To: maddog55
It is hard to debate eras and the ‘best’.
19 posted on
02/01/2008 4:48:55 PM PST by
BGHater
("Ron Paul won every debate!" Rudy Giuliani)
To: maddog55
The thing about Brady, is that he's not going to get up there in statistics. But I guess the only statistic that matters is the rings on the fingers. And dating the hot babes.
I can easily see Brady try to get a 5th, or even a 6th Super Bowl rings here. (Let's get real Giants fans, the Pats are going to run the table here).
20 posted on
02/01/2008 4:48:56 PM PST by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(The Constitution does not give me the authority to run your life - Ron Paul)
To: maddog55
To: maddog55
I was watching Super Bowl X the other day, and it occurred to me it would be funny as heck if Staubach and Bradshaw were suddenly replaced by Manning and Brady. I don’t think they would be used to the world of hurt that QBs lived in back then.
22 posted on
02/01/2008 4:50:16 PM PST by
Dreagon
To: maddog55
Yes, he just might be (he’s a long way from being done)
23 posted on
02/01/2008 4:50:24 PM PST by
fhayek
To: maddog55
It’s amusing to read all of the ‘No’ responses.
Just today, Joe Theisman flatly stated that Tom Brady is the best quarterback to have ever played the game. He also noted Unitas and Montana, but said that Brady was better.
But then again, what does a quarterback like Theisman know? /s
25 posted on
02/01/2008 4:52:41 PM PST by
CASchack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson