Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2008 9:47:10 AM PST by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000
A recently-release roadmap for the next major Window release – Windows 7 – indicates that Microsoft is planning to release the new operating system in the second half of 2009, rather than the anticipated release date of some time in 2010.

So, in other words, rush it to market. That's what they did with Vista - how did that turn out?

2 posted on 01/23/2008 9:55:37 AM PST by jdm (A Hunter Thompson ticket would be suicide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

By my calculation, Windows 7 is 88 less than Windows 95.


4 posted on 01/23/2008 9:58:16 AM PST by Question Liberal Authority (Carbon Dioxide is NOT POLLUTION. It is PLANT FOOD, necessary for all life on Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

5 posted on 01/23/2008 10:00:01 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

From some searching on the net, it appears the end date for purchasing Windows XP with a new computer or at retail is June 30 of this year. That would leave a year of only Vista systems on new Windows computers before this next operating system comes along. I guess we will have to make do in the meantime or get that piece of crap, which is unlikely to run current hardware (for example I have a HP Laserjet 6P that I bought in 1996 that is doing just fine at age 12). Also XP SP-3 should be out by then too (yeah, I know the beta is out now).


9 posted on 01/23/2008 10:18:43 AM PST by CedarDave (The early primaries are port-o-potties rented to the left to pee in the conservative hot tub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000
Actually, an article I once read about the, then new, head of the Windows team gives me some hope. This was at the time when Vista was in early Beta testing, so it was a done deal.

As the story went, he had all of Windows function names printed out and their dependencies mapped with lines to connect them. He posted the whole mess on the wall for all the developers to see. Then, on another wall, he posted the same thing for Linux, so they could really see the difference, and what they were up against.

Apparently, he has made some real major changes in the developers' thinking and is making them write a much stronger and more sensible underlying O/S this time around.

As I said, it gives me some hope. I'm not sold yet, but interested to see if it works out. Heck, once the UI guys get hold of it, it could still be ruined anyway. *shrug*

11 posted on 01/23/2008 10:40:04 AM PST by TChris ("if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy." -RR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

Vista is suffering the same fate as Windows ME.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jYJwwUVQaRY&feature=related


12 posted on 01/23/2008 10:55:06 AM PST by Kolb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

This is good news, assuming they get it right. I’m not eager to leave XP but acknowledge I’ll have to at some point, and Vista doesn’t particularly appeal to me.


15 posted on 01/23/2008 11:51:21 AM PST by Turbopilot (iumop ap!sdn w,I 'aw dlaH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson