Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police examining items for signs tiger was taunted
CNN ^ | 1/3/2008 | CNN

Posted on 01/03/2008 6:12:02 AM PST by Red in Blue PA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-288 next last
To: aroundabout

In 1952, I was “talked to” by a zoo keeper cuz I was throwin’ peanuts at the monkeys on Cleveland Zoo’s Monkey Island!


201 posted on 01/03/2008 9:23:15 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Muleteam1
I agreed that attributing human thought processes to wild animals, or even to a family dog, is foolish at best.


202 posted on 01/03/2008 9:34:11 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (Just how will wrecking the U.S. economy save the planet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: All
FACTS about Tatiana:

"Even as a cub, she was noted for her "quick-tempered" personality compared to her more mellow sibling".

Tatiana was known as "grabber" among zoo employees.

September 7, 2007 article in SFGate by Patricia Yollin - Tidbits:

10 months after the mauling, the customary public feeding of the lions again took place.

"Before the mauling occurred, the feedings - which usually drew an enormous crowd of adults and children - would take place at 2 PM EVERYDAY BUT MONDAY, when the big cats fast."

"It was always a deafening experience, with feline roars and human screams filling the vast room."

Was the feeding schedule changed because of the holiday?

I don't know how to post the website so maybe someone can help out.

203 posted on 01/03/2008 9:38:38 AM PST by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
Note that I did not say it was foolish to attribute animal characteristics to humans.


204 posted on 01/03/2008 9:52:17 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack

Not to argue the issue regarding inadequacy, but the fact that the tiger got out has no bearing on whether the enclosure was substandard or not. The standards are defined independent of the actual behavior of the cat - with the intention that following the standards would confine any enclosed cat.

I would agree that the animal’s escape is indicative of an inadequate enclosure, but do not know whether or not the enclosure itself was within the guidelines for such pens.


205 posted on 01/03/2008 10:05:14 AM PST by MortMan (Have a pheasant plucking day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
Two of them have very muslim-sounding names, btw.

The names sound Hindu, Indian non-moslem to me.
206 posted on 01/03/2008 10:27:31 AM PST by Cheburashka (Liberals never think what they have done is wrong, they think they haven't done it enough yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: arbooz
Unless they are sick, all animals are guided by their instincts Other than while hunting in the wild, attacking instinct is the last one to kick in. ANY animal will prefer to retreat when threatened unless it feels cornered. There's no such thing as a "random attack" by a healthy animal.

That is too broad a statement. Rural people like myself ( I suspect microgood is one too) could tell you of numerous stories of people doing nothing more than doing their daily toil and getting attacked by animals. Such was the case of a local woman was attacked by a buck while getting her morning paper. It was during "rutting"season just before Thanksgiving.

Healthy wild animals attack humans for a variety of reasons. True while it may appear "random" to the uninitiated animals attacking humans do have a reason, be it territorial, protection or sickness

All the more reason to treat all animals with respect and and at a healthy distance.
207 posted on 01/03/2008 10:29:15 AM PST by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: MortMan
Not to argue the issue regarding inadequacy, but the fact that the tiger got out has no bearing on whether the enclosure was substandard or not.

I'm not sure I follow you. The guidelines are there for the purpose of designing safe pens that the animal cannot escape from. You can conceivably construct a safe pen with lower walls than the recommended height, which is why it's a guideline rather than a rule, but if the animal can escape then it's not standard. The SF zoo had built a moat, which probably would have made the pen okay, if it were filled, but it was not. Moats aren't built to be dry holes.

208 posted on 01/03/2008 10:30:23 AM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Cheburashka

“The names sound Hindu, Indian non-moslem to me.”
You might be right. But muslims aren’t known for their ethical treatment of animals. It’s a superiority thing!
Abdul:”I am better than a dog!”
Achmed: “Well, I am better than an American zoo tiger! Watch this!” Aims slingshot,,,,,,,,,,,,


209 posted on 01/03/2008 10:39:46 AM PST by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ("Don't touch that thing")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
I'm just sorry the tiger didn't get all three of them before she was killed by the police.

San Francisco peninsula teenagers suck. Glad I moved out of there.

210 posted on 01/03/2008 10:56:08 AM PST by The KG9 Kid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
Do you think the Lion Witness knows what the tiger did with the 4th young man?

Hypothesis: Four punks. One has slingshot and annoys the tiger. Tiger gets out. He mauls the closest kid, and the other three take off, two in one direction, one in the opposite direction. Tiger finishes explaining how annoyed she is with the first punk, catches the scent of the other three punks, goes in direction that two of them went, letting the third third get away scot free. Third one is the one carrying the slingshot.

Just a hypothesis, but if it happened this way, punk #4 has no motivation to come forward.

211 posted on 01/03/2008 11:04:58 AM PST by Cheburashka (Liberals never think what they have done is wrong, they think they haven't done it enough yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
So far there’s been only this one case “publicly known”. In the previous 60 years they could have had a regular problem with animals wandering about untended, but as long as no one got hurt or killed, the zoo could keep the information private.
There are, however, staff people who know “stories”, and I’m sure they’ll be telling them to some lawyer soon enough.

Worst of all we know that the zoo staff immediately assumed that the loose cat was a tiger and that there could be four tigers loose.

That means that in their own minds, staff members instantly focused on the very enclosure the one cat escaped from.

Wonder why they did that?


Do you REALLY believe in our lawsuit happy society that if ANYONE was injured that they wouldn’t sue the you know what out of the zoo, if it was unprovoked?

People can “assume” anything. That’s not a crime. It’s looking more and more like only ONE was taunted.

I think it makes perfect sense to look at the enclosure when one has gotten OUT of the enclosure. As previously mentioned, the “guidelines” or “suggestions” on how high the enclosure can be are just that - not REQUIREMENTS. After 60 years of being in the zoo business, if this enclosure was sooooooooooooo dangerously low, I’d expect animals to be escaping all the time, wouldn’t you?

Of course I can't speak for you ... but I don't carry sling shots around in the car or on my person. I find that a tad odd. Also I'm NOT impressed with the criminal record of these three. Yes, I know, I'm not supposed to know that or dare call attention to that FACT but it does enter into the it and the "character" of these HOSTILE and UNCOOPERATIVE individuals.

212 posted on 01/03/2008 11:12:34 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

“The height as it is now happens to be BELOW the guidelines. I’m really surprised that you could say that it was OK given that even the top administrator says it’s too low.
Do you perhaps sell large animal cages or something?”

So after 60 years of no escaping tigers ... suddenly “guidelines” are not REQUIREMENTS.

Perhaps you need to learn English?

A “guideline” is not the same as a “requirement”.

It sure sounds like you WANT to be an expert on zoos and cages ... although when it comes to animal experts, Jack has more knowledge than you’ll ever have on tigers and how they react to taunting and interact in a zoo environment.


213 posted on 01/03/2008 11:15:44 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
It’s just you. =============== LOL, good reply
214 posted on 01/03/2008 11:22:14 AM PST by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra

Until we know their religion there’s no reason to speculate. All religions have their share of asshats. The age of the punks is a stage in life when many young males exhibit asshatlike behavior, some intermittently, some incessantly.


215 posted on 01/03/2008 11:28:25 AM PST by Cheburashka (Liberals never think what they have done is wrong, they think they haven't done it enough yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe

Isn’t posession of a slingshot in California a felony?


216 posted on 01/03/2008 11:56:54 AM PST by B4Ranch (( "Freedom is not free, but don't worry the U.S. Marine Corps will pay most of your share." ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Bravo! Thank you for your voice of reason!

If the woman's timeframe is correct, the cats would have endured nearly 45 minutes of presumably escalating abuse before Tatiana (rightfully) snapped.

217 posted on 01/03/2008 12:00:31 PM PST by repinwi (Don't squat with your spurs on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Jack Hanna retracted his orignal assessment of this event.


218 posted on 01/03/2008 12:07:31 PM PST by Sacajaweau ("The Cracker" will be renamed "The Crapper")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: SpringheelJack
The San Francisco Zoo’s tiger ‘grotto’ was built in the 1940’s. This was at a time when most zoos were keeping their big cats in barred cages. This exhibit was nearly two decades ahead of its time when it was built, and was undoubtedly quite a sensation. One of the unique features of this exhibit was the use of a ‘dry moat’– a feature that eliminated the need for any kind of a visible barrier between the animals and the general public. The moat is 33 feet across– farther then even the most athletic tiger could ever jump. The tigers could go down into the moat– probably planned as a safety feature if one did try to jump– and get back out again via a set of ‘tiger stairs’. The front wall of the moat, the wall everyone is concerned about, is 12.5 feet high.

Conventional wisdom says that a lion can jump 12 feet straight up. Seeing that lions and tigers are nearly identical internally, it follows that a tiger can do this as well. Knowing this, the height of the wall was set just a little higher than the big cats could jump. And, this wall worked as the designers intended for nearly 70 years. Few zoo exhibits anywhere have been in existence for 70 years, so this is a pretty good safety record. Also consider this wall has been inspected over and over, and approved by certifying agencies for many years.

http://www.bloggernews.net/112818

219 posted on 01/03/2008 12:08:01 PM PST by repinwi (Don't squat with your spurs on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Isn’t posession of a slingshot in California a felony?

And thinking of the possession of one is a thought crime in Kalifornia.

220 posted on 01/03/2008 12:09:46 PM PST by from occupied ga (Your most dangerous enemy is your own government, Benito Guilinni a short man in search of a balcony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 281-288 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson