Posted on 01/03/2008 6:12:02 AM PST by Red in Blue PA
SAN FRANCISCO, California (CNN) -- Police are investigating whether several items found in the enclosure of a tiger who fatally mauled a 17-year-old man show that the animal was attacked or taunted, San Francisco Zoo spokesman Sam Singer said Wednesday.
Police are examining a large rock, a tree branch and other items, Singer said.
"They [police] are trying to make a determination that those items or any other things that happened on Christmas Day were part of some attack on the tiger or something that angered Tatiana, causing her to come out of her cage," the spokesman said.
San Francisco Police Chief Heather Fong has said that a shoe print found on the railing at the tiger enclosure is being examined to determine if one of the victims climbed over the rail or threw their leg over the side.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Then you haven’t been reading that much.
________
Of course. Anyone without your perspective is obviously ignorant.
Taking away the ‘those thugs got what they deserved’ posts, the largest bloc of comments really seem to center on the enclosure.
Interestingly enough, your freight train post was only the 2nd post in this thread in which the word blame was found. That was 130 posts in. The first time it cropped up, it was to state that the kids were not blameless.
That is really funny, last year a drunk kid ran threw my fence, the cops came, and I said, did they write him a ticket, the answer was no one saw him driving, so no ticket. Seeing four people in one spot does not mean they were at another spot except in someones mind. It is meaningless dribble!
Let's look at another thing...The boys had eaten at the Zoo Cafe earlier and apparently, they weren't rowdy or someone would have said so by now. And no one has given us the time when this occurred. Maybe it conflicts with the "lion witness" statement.
Here he's saying there was a miracle and the tiger got loose, or Jack is simply pulling the wool over his own eyes and denying that a tiger got loose.
Dec 25, 2007.
Do you perhaps sell large animal cages or something?
Do you think the Lion Witness knows what the tiger did with the 4th young man?
The animal can't get leverage to jump from the water.
Exactly, the motivation of the animal is irrelevant. Suppose the boys were just wearing the wrong color on the wrong day.
There are, however, staff people who know "stories", and I'm sure they'll be telling them to some lawyer soon enough.
Worst of all we know that the zoo staff immediately assumed that the loose cat was a tiger and that there could be four tigers loose.
That means that in their own minds, staff members instantly focused on the very enclosure the one cat escaped from.
Wonder why they did that?
One witness recalled that one of the victims had got the tiger by the tail, it was plain to see!
I was also struck by the fact that the police must have pretty good firepower there, which was a very good thing under the circumstances, shame to lose such a beautiful animal, don't know what it takes to kill a tiger, we have had incidents with dogs where it has taken several shots by the police from a 9mm to drop them.
One report aired in my area said that the police found slingshots on the victims. Plural. Empty vodka bottle in auto they were driving.,
Who in the world takes a slingshot to a zoo?
These 3 creeps were looking for trouble. They found it.
The tiger is geting blamed for something that never should have happened.
There's dispute over the slingshots.
Remember, the investigation isn't done. The cops have DNA test results to get back (for the "blood trail" because that will give us an idea of who was doing what to whom), and there are witnesses to be located and talked to.
I did not mean to suggest the persons accused of taunting the animals, if this is what they did, should be cut any slack. I feel quite a bit more sympathy for the dead tiger who was after all being what she was supposed to be, a wild animal, then I do the kids who got what they deserved.
I had a feeling my #189 wasn’t going to last. :-)
"In the wild, tigers can leap as high as 5 m (16 ft) and as far as 9–10 m (30–33 ft), making them one of the highest-jumping mammals (just slightly behind cougars in jumping ability)."
This particular passage is from Wikipedia but if you search "how high can a tiger jump" that same information is found from multiple sources.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.