Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe 6-pack
Likewise, from a biblical perspective, humans are responsible to the beasts merely out of respect for God's creation

the only beast I've ever been responsible to was my ex-wife

I'm not aware of anywhere in the Bible it says I'm responsible to the beasts.....the Bible mainly starts on about how they are food after Noah when before Man was not a meat eater.....later on about how an Ox gores ya the you kill it and don't eat it....even if God forbid...someone teased it...and while we are on Jesus....I would wager Jesus would offer more empathy to dead kids and their families than a dead tigers....just a hunch....you brought it up

we live in an age where many place much much more value on neat animals like tigers and elephants and whales than on babies....i think that's screwy and this thread sorta dances around that Gaia style theme.....pretty weird for a conservative forum.....

it's threads like this that give me pause about the average maturity around here.....but than I can go to a prayer thread and see how wonderful conservatives can be

370 posted on 12/27/2007 9:46:50 PM PST by wardaddy (I have come to the conclusion that even though imperfect....Thompson is my choice by far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]


To: wardaddy
I agree with you that our insane worship of animals as gods is totally wrong....its Paganism, pure and simple.....people are adorning their cats and dogs with jewelry, expensive clothing items, special beds and dog houses,cosmetic surgery even.....

but I do think God meant for us to be good stewards of HIS gifts, one of them being the animals that inhabit earth with us....

379 posted on 12/27/2007 9:59:05 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy
"I'm not aware of anywhere in the Bible it says I'm responsible to the beasts....."

In Genesis, God gives man dominion over the beasts, the birds, the fishes, etc. You're free to exercise that responsibility as carefully or carelessly as you please. Certainly, Judeo-Christian tradition as well as most other world religions place the heavy emphasis on our treatment and respect for our fellow man...and there's nowhere I've disputed or contested that. All I've said is that if, as some evidence suggests, these fellows invited or contributed to their mauling, it is indeed they themselves that showed a reckless disregard for the sanctity of their own human lives. I don't have a particular love or affection for tigers, but I certainly have a healthy respect for them.

Indeed, the loss of human life here is tragic, but it's a tragedy that will only be compounded when the investigative findings demonstrate how avoidable it was, wether fault is ultimately fixed upon zoo officials, the victims or some as yet unidentified third party. To affix blame squarely on the tiger for merely doing what tigers do is ridiculous. Either the enclosure was inadequate in its inherent design, or was somehow breached by the action or inaction of some human(s).

382 posted on 12/27/2007 10:08:03 PM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson