Posted on 12/27/2007 10:18:04 AM PST by wardaddy
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The big cat exhibit at the San Francisco Zoo was cordoned off as a crime scene Wednesday as investigators tried to determine whether a Siberian tiger that killed a visitor escaped from its high-walled pen on its own or got help from someone, inadvertent or otherwise.
Police shot the 300-pound animal to death after a Christmas Day rampage that began when the tiger escaped from an enclosure surrounded by what zoo officials said are an 18-foot wall and a 20-foot moat. Two brothers who also were visiting the zoo were severely mauled.
Police Chief Heather Fong said the department has opened a criminal investigation to "determine if there was human involvement in the tiger getting out or if the tiger was able to get out on its own."
Police said they have not ruled anything out, including whether the escape was the result of carelessness or a deliberate act.
(AP) Tatiana, a female Siberian tiger that killed one person and injured two others, is seen in the lion... Full Image
Fong said officers were gathering evidence from the tiger's enclosure as well as accounts from witnesses and others.
One zoo official insisted the tiger did not get out through an open door and must have climbed or leaped out. But Jack Hanna, former director of the Columbus Zoo and a frequent guest on TV, said such a leap would be an unbelievable feat, and "virtually impossible."
"There's something going on here. It just doesn't feel right to me," he said. "It just doesn't add up to me."
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.myway.com ...
IF they taunted the tiger (and that hasn't been conclusively proven yet) then they earned what happened to them.
You are Right about that, and the Cat had to be Killed, but it's just Such a Tragedy All the Way Around.
As the tiger approached...one dude was heard saying “Don’t eat me bro”.
Yeah.
I’ve done some dumb things but taunting tigers... not on my “dumb list” .
“Do the guys deserve punishment for taunting a caged cat? Yes.
Do they deserve death? Decidedly not.”
The problem is the consequences of the choice to “taunt a caged cat” were not theirs to choose.
That’s why it’s a smart thing to think about the consequences *before* you make a choice.
some even went for drawing and quartering
and the select few went “medieval on his ass”..lol
said genetic debris of course does not include you or your spawn naturally
dang....that is very good.......i’m humbled Mr Wilde
I wouldn’t quite equivocate Jeffrey Dahmer with run of the mill tiger teasers myself.
I think this thread is a convergence of Mike Vick/Animals rule threads and what some here call Darwin cleans the gene pool threads
and they speak loudly how some FReepers are what they are.....animal worshippers meet the cool to death crowd ...and some are better suited for Prayer threads
and some like me.....in between
the only beast I've ever been responsible to was my ex-wife
I'm not aware of anywhere in the Bible it says I'm responsible to the beasts.....the Bible mainly starts on about how they are food after Noah when before Man was not a meat eater.....later on about how an Ox gores ya the you kill it and don't eat it....even if God forbid...someone teased it...and while we are on Jesus....I would wager Jesus would offer more empathy to dead kids and their families than a dead tigers....just a hunch....you brought it up
we live in an age where many place much much more value on neat animals like tigers and elephants and whales than on babies....i think that's screwy and this thread sorta dances around that Gaia style theme.....pretty weird for a conservative forum.....
it's threads like this that give me pause about the average maturity around here.....but than I can go to a prayer thread and see how wonderful conservatives can be
It will be interesting to see how the cat got out.
The very low incidence of rodent transmission of rabies in the US does not mean they do not contract it.
Agencies which test for rabies often refuse to test squirrels and other small rodents.
First of all, rodents who are exposed to the disease are usually killed by whatever predator would give it to them. When they are infected and still survive whatever attacks them, they die of the disease much more rapidly than other animals infected. Bats, for instance, live quite a while after infection which makes them more of a transmission problem. There are other mysteries to the why small rodents rarely transmit, I wonder if it's their relatively short life cycle in general--but assuming they are immune is not a deduction to make. Groundhogs for some reason, transmit a lot of rabies.
The animals that commonly transmit rabies all have different cycles of infection, transmission and death.
An exotic imported for pet fanciers would be a complete wild card.
You are officially the 7th reasonable post I’ve seen here.
Thank You...according to some here tigers just know...when they aren’t busy practicing brain surgery or reading Hegel.
lol....and that Newsom guy....and Pelosi and Boxer
I wish.....naive adventurer in a confederacy of dunces
that is true
so in Jess's world folks tease animals then death is appropriate...man....rough neighborhood eh Jess?
but I do think God meant for us to be good stewards of HIS gifts, one of them being the animals that inhabit earth with us....
Designer 1: “Say, don’t you think it should be a little higher in case someone gets in there and dangles his leg over the side to provoke the cat.”
Designer 2: “Are you crazy? Nobody’s that stupid!”
My thoughts exactly! This would not have happened in the '40s or '50s.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.