Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored
Leave Vista on the new machine. Just don't do anything with it except install VMware, and run XP in the VM. No need to ever see Vista except when you boot the machine cold.

So all the bad things about Vista (excessive shut down times, file transfer problems, clunky slow operation, the need for excessive amounts of RAM, etc.) go away? Just like that?

36 posted on 12/26/2007 8:32:04 PM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: CedarDave
>> Leave Vista on the new machine. Just don't do anything with it except install VMware, and run XP in the VM. No need to ever see Vista except when you boot the machine cold.

> So all the bad things about Vista (excessive shut down times, file transfer problems, clunky slow operation, the need for excessive amounts of RAM, etc.) go away? Just like that?

Fair questions.

You're still stuck with the overhead of Vista. On the other hand, you're not dealing with it at the "user" level, you're dealing far below the surface.

In a VM, all the normal user file operations take place in the monolithic "virtual disk file" of the VM. So most of the nasty overhead of Vista's file handling is invisible because Vista just thinks you're updating a big single file (the virtual "disk"), and NTFS is pretty good at that.

The RAM question... well, when I run a VM on Vista I allocate as much of the RAM for the VM as I can get away with. I don't try with less than 2GB total, and more is better.

Did you notice that 4GB is now $150? RAM is cheap. Don't sweat RAM. Get lots and don't look back.

42 posted on 12/26/2007 8:45:09 PM PST by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson