Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clemens issues vehement denial ( through attorney of course ) ... claims slander
Houston Chronicle ^ | 12.14.07

Posted on 12/14/2007 8:40:56 AM PST by meandog

On Clemens' stance regarding claims in Mitchell Report that he used and was injected with banned performance-enhancing drugs from 1998-2001: ``Roger Clemens adamantly, vehemently and whatever other adjectives can be used, denies that he has ever used steroids or whatever the word is for improper substances. ``He is really concerned and upset that he has been named in this report based on the allegations of apparently, reading the report, based on a trainer (Brian McNamee) that he has had in the past. ``That's not a standard somebody should be held out in public to have done something as serious as have used steroids in baseball.''

In a release by Hardin's office earlier Thursday, NcNamee is described as a "troubled and unreliable witness" and "a former trainer who worked with Clemenson the Toronto Blue Jays and the New York Yankees, (who) has repeatdedly denied these current claims, including in June of this year whe he was first contacted by federal investigators. According to McNamee, after a day of repeated denials to federal investigators, he changed his story under the threat of federal criminal prosecution. He says he was then forced by those federal prosecutorial authorities to tell the same story for inclusion in the Mitchell Report."

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Sports
KEYWORDS: cheat; clemens; dirtbag; druggie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
Gearing up for a lawsuit? Hope so, love to see cheats lose big time!
1 posted on 12/14/2007 8:40:57 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: meandog

I know nothing about baseball and very little about this case..but I don’t like the smell of congree releaseing names on anything telling the world someone is guilty without it being proven..it sounds like mcarthyism...some folks seem to think it’s ok if it rich ball playeres...


2 posted on 12/14/2007 8:44:02 AM PST by conservativehusker (GO BIG RED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
There will be no lawsuit.

Clemens' use of steroids was one of the worst-kept secrets in baseball over the last decade.

Any doubts I had about that were erased as soon as I saw/heard the statement from his smarmy lawyer who looks and acts like a character from a bad "B" movie set in Texas.

3 posted on 12/14/2007 8:47:48 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker

This has nothing to do with Congress.IIRC,this investigation was put in motion by Major League Baseball itself.


4 posted on 12/14/2007 8:48:06 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meandog
This is the problem I have will entire incident are the following:

1) Did Mitchell have the power of subpoenas?

2) Were people required to sign affidavits before giving evidence or reqiured to take an oath under the threat of perjury?

3) Where is eveidence to back up these claims?

4) Andro was neither illegal nor a banned substance when McGuire took it. I wonder if the concept of ex post facto means anything to any one?
5 posted on 12/14/2007 8:49:04 AM PST by Perdogg (Elections have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

It’s not even just Major League Baseball, either. These accusations were based on testimony provided in one or more Federal investigations, so they would have been a matter of public record at some point anyway.


6 posted on 12/14/2007 8:49:44 AM PST by Alberta's Child (I'm out on the outskirts of nowhere . . . with ghosts on my trail, chasing me there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: meandog
If gambling could keep Pete Rose out of the Hall of Fame (as it should) then steroids should keep Clements,Bonds and others out.
7 posted on 12/14/2007 8:49:58 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I agree. These men are adults and they have the right to put anything in their bodies if they want to.

I think Members of Congress should have to pee in a cup.


8 posted on 12/14/2007 8:50:30 AM PST by Perdogg (Elections have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Clemens was so upset he popped the button on his 21 inch shirt collar.


9 posted on 12/14/2007 8:53:10 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Fred Thompson's Federalism is right on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservativehusker

I would appreciate it if you didn’t associate this situation with “McCarthyism”.

Joseph McCarthy vigorously resisted releasing ANY names on people in the public hearings, since (in his words) they had not been tried in a court of law and might be ultimately be proven innocent. He referred to them all as “Case #1” and so on.

He was FORCED to reveal names by liberals on the other side of the aisle and the media who had no qualms about ruining the lives of people whose ruin might be a useful instrument in discrediting McCarthy and the anti-communist cause.

This is another liberal slander...most people don’t realize it, and I would guess you probably didn’t either. I knew exactly what you meant, though.


10 posted on 12/14/2007 8:53:33 AM PST by rlmorel (Liberals: If the Truth would help them, they would use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: meandog
"Roger Clemens adamantly, vehemently and whatever other adjectives can be used, denies that he has ever used steroids or whatever the word is for improper substances."

I think he needs to hire a new lawyer, for starters.
11 posted on 12/14/2007 8:59:04 AM PST by The Pack Knight (Duty, Honor, Country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Roger Clemens adamantly, vehemently and whatever other adjectives can be used, denies that he has ever used steroids or whatever the word is for improper substances.

This from a lawyer?

12 posted on 12/14/2007 9:01:01 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

A former U.S. senator issues a damning report, and you want to call Clemens’ lawyer smarmy? Sheeesh!


13 posted on 12/14/2007 9:07:39 AM PST by thelastvirgil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Pack Knight

All Clemens needs to do is sue his personal trainer (who worked for him since ‘87), who stated that he personally injected steroids into Clemens’ ass on multiple occasions. Call a press conference and call his trainer a lie and sue him for slander.


14 posted on 12/14/2007 9:08:41 AM PST by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Mitchell is not a non-partisan in anything and is not, imo, a disinterested person.

Personally, I'd love to see the lawsuits fly in all directions, what lawyers call the shotgun stategery.

Eighty-five players named, almost all millionaires with lawyers, thirty ball clubs plus MLB all with rooms full of lawyers.

A wet dream. Go to Sam's and buy a crate of popcorn, this could be really a lot of fun.

15 posted on 12/14/2007 9:14:08 AM PST by metesky ("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I stand corrected...I will have to read more about those time..(It was little bofore my time) but I guess I learned the liberal interpretation in school and media..


16 posted on 12/14/2007 9:16:14 AM PST by conservativehusker (GO BIG RED!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

Actually a lot of these guys were named in Jose Canseco’s book a few yrs ago

Note that no one has sued Canseco....and the media who bashed Canseco earlier are now having to agree with him

The one thing that puzzled me yesterday was the Mitchell Commission advising baseball “not to punish the players...except in agregious cases”.....which means Mitchell and Co. may be a little nervous about the accuracy....esp if they had to answer in court.

The best way for all to handle the issue is to stop watching MLB. The only way they will clean it up is for people to stay away from games and not watch on TV


17 posted on 12/14/2007 9:16:50 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Mike Huckabee values illegals, criminals, and terrorists...Thanks "Values Voters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

The best way for all to handle the issue is to stop watching MLB

I can’t wait for spring training.


18 posted on 12/14/2007 9:17:52 AM PST by angcat ("IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
This has nothing to do with Congress.IIRC,this investigation was put in motion by Major League Baseball itself.

... to head-off, or to shape a subsequent Congressional inquiry -- so the Mitchell Report has EVERYTHING to do with Congress. That's why they picked a former Senator to lead the investigation. Now that the report is over, Mitchell's job will be to get Congress to swallow its conclusions & remedies without going beyond what MLB is prepared to do.

19 posted on 12/14/2007 9:22:29 AM PST by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
4) Andro was neither illegal nor a banned substance when McGuire took it. I wonder if the concept of ex post facto means anything to any one?

I think its safe to say that Mark McGwire went far beyond Andro with his training program considering his relationship with Canseco & the proximity of BALCO. But your other questions are valid.

20 posted on 12/14/2007 9:24:52 AM PST by Tallguy (Climate is what you plan for, weather is what you get.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson