[MarkDel]

That’s actually a good argument you make. But as we both understand, Michael Vick was NOT treated to double the sentence because the Judge or Society has a hatred of Gambling. Vick’s sentence was double the recommendation of the Prosecution because the public was vocal in their disgust over the killing of Dogs.

[1rudeboy]

It's the judge's call. A recommendation is just that, a recommendation. So Mr. Vick had the misfortune of crossing paths with a judge that loves dogs. Tough luck.

[discostu]

The sentence is NOT double the recommendation. The recommendation topped out at 18 months, the judge made it 23 months which isn’t even 30% more. Also in between when the recommendation was made and now Vick failed a drug test and apparently failed a lie detector test during one of his “cooperative” interviews. Vick didn’t do a good job upholding his part of the bargain, and thus showed that his contrition was just an act, so he got a few extra months thrown on, life suck when you’re a loser.

[highball]

That’s actually a good argument you make. But as we both understand, Michael Vick was NOT treated to double the sentence because the Judge or Society has a hatred of Gambling. Vick’s sentence was double the recommendation of the Prosecution because the public was vocal in their disgust over the killing of Dogs.

Actually, Vick was treated to an increased sentence because he lied to the judge and prosecutors after he took the deal.

Just making sure that little fact doesn't get lost....