All I can say is I am glad that it wasn't in the books, I don't think I will let my little kids know about her stupid idea either.
1 posted on
10/20/2007 8:42:39 AM PDT by
Abathar
To: Abathar
It does bring a whole new meaning to the term “Head Boy” though....
2 posted on
10/20/2007 8:43:28 AM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Abathar
How very “inclusive” of her to include a homosexual character.Now which one was the “transgendered” one?
3 posted on
10/20/2007 8:47:15 AM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(If martyrdom is so cool,why does Osama Obama go to such great lengths to avoid it?)
To: Abathar
I guess the part where Dumbledore molested Harry was left out of the book.
To: Abathar
5 posted on
10/20/2007 9:35:45 AM PDT by
chesley
(Where's the omelet? -- Orwell)
To: Abathar
I'll bet she woulddn't have said that if Richard Harris was still portraying him.
7 posted on
10/20/2007 9:54:51 AM PDT by
Old Seadog
(Inside every old person is a young person saying "WTF happened?".)
To: Abathar
Explains alot about why this guy enjoyed the company of all those young boys.
To: Abathar
Why? Why? Why? Why? Why ruin it! JK Rowling is a flippin dummy.
To: Abathar
Gives a new meaning to “magic wand.”
To: Abathar
“Oh, my god,” Rowling concluded
To whom is she referring?
12 posted on
10/20/2007 4:51:16 PM PDT by
beefree
(MY PEOPLE PERISH FOR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson