Holy galloping tundra, Batman!
1 posted on
09/27/2007 3:24:42 PM PDT by
cogitator
To: cogitator
For my share of $100,000,000.00, I’d find evidence of any type of catastrophe you wanted me to study.
2 posted on
09/27/2007 3:30:16 PM PDT by
G Larry
(HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
To: cogitator
If a scientist weren’t hopelessly biased in favor of the existing religion of global warming, they would look at this rapidly changing situation and think - there must be something causing this region (and JUST this region) to be deteriorating to quickly when on the opposite side of the globe Antarctica is growing faster than anytime seem by man.
And since the predictions for the Arctic region have been badly underestimated for warming, then there may be reasons OTHER than those currently attributed as the source of the change. But I’m sure its infinitely easier just to claim that the proof we predicted would happen in 2100 is happening in 2007 because they were just far, far, far more correct than even they could have predicted.
In any other science, when your predictions end up being off by a factor of 10X you are forced to change your theory. If a patients temperature went up to 105 degrees in 10 minutes instead of 10 hours, the doctor wouldn’t determine that his original diagnosis was right. He would look to find out what was causing the change which wasn’t possible based on his original diagnosis. But hey, medicine is an ‘art’ while climatology is a ‘science’.
3 posted on
09/27/2007 3:34:41 PM PDT by
bpjam
(Harry Reid doesn't represent me. I'm an American!)
To: cogitator
I guess they weren’t near where the guy got stuck in the ice a few weeks back - or the Ruskies were delayed a few days planting that flag on the bottom of the Arctic Sea because of Unusually Thick Sea Ice.
5 posted on
09/27/2007 3:39:23 PM PDT by
PeteB570
(Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
To: cogitator; GMMAC; Clive; exg; kanawa; conniew; backhoe; -YYZ-; Former Proud Canadian; ...
One of 44 Canadian research initiatives to receive a total of $100 million (IPY) research funding from the federal government,What?

8 posted on
09/27/2007 5:13:21 PM PDT by
fanfan
("We don't start fights my friends, but we finish them, and never leave until our work is done."PMSH)
To: cogitator
One of 44 Canadian research initiatives to receive a total of $100 million (IPY) research funding from the federal governmentIs there any doubt in anyone's mind why so many 'scientists' latch onto the global warming thing? They all want a federal tit to attach to. Deny global warming and you don't get no dough.
9 posted on
09/27/2007 5:37:56 PM PDT by
Lizavetta
( Politicians: When they're speaking, they're lying - when they're not speaking, they're stealing.)
To: cogitator
The reported condition is not abnormal for this particular island. It has, as it turns out, Grizzly Bears.
Means it's a lot less cold there than many other places that far North.
12 posted on
10/01/2007 7:06:20 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: cogitator
Comparing this summer's observations against aerial photos dating back to the 1950s, and the team's monitoring of the area for the past five years, the research leader calls the present conditions "unprecedented" in scope and activity. Wow, they compared all the way back to the 1950s. That's practically the beginning of time!
Everyone knows that the only natural seasonal cycles are winter, spring, summer and fall. Anything else has to be Bush's fault. Bush and those damned SUVs.
13 posted on
10/01/2007 7:06:27 PM PDT by
Bubba_Leroy
(What did Rather know and when did he know it?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson