Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Source Developers Shun GPLv3, Survey Says
Information week ^ | September 26th | Paul McDougall

Posted on 09/27/2007 6:00:45 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing

Fearing the restrictions it places on their work, the majority of open source software developers do not plan to publish code in the next year under a controversial new license authored by the main governing body for open source and free software, according to a survey released Wednesday.

In addition, more than 40% of those surveyed said they won't ever publish their work under Version 3 of the General Public License, which was released earlier this year by the Free Software Foundation. "GPLv3 is controversial because it imposes restrictions on what you can do with programs," said John Andrews, CEO of survey taker Evans Data, in a statement.

The survey found that only 6% of the 380 open source developers polled by Evans Data have adopted GPLv3 since it was published in June. Some 66% said they will not adopt it within the next year, and 43% said they will never use GPLv3.

(Excerpt) Read more at informationweek.com ...


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: foss; gpl; linux; oss
Good news for pragmatists, bad news for the church of software.

By now everybody should know that Linus isn't biting. GPLv2 is more free than v3.

1 posted on 09/27/2007 6:00:48 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Stallman should have quit while he was ahead. By pushing his political agenda into the license, he’s alienating a large base of the OSS community.


2 posted on 09/27/2007 6:04:38 AM PDT by kevkrom (The religion of global warming: "There is no goddess but Gaia and Al Gore is her profit.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..

3 posted on 09/27/2007 7:31:15 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom
> Stallman should have quit while he was ahead. By pushing his political agenda into the license, he’s alienating a large base of the OSS community.

Yep. Despite all the respect and appreciation I have for RMS's work on the GNU software, he's become a ranting, self-righteous twit and is now part of the problem. The world already has plenty of ranting twits.

4 posted on 09/27/2007 8:04:30 AM PDT by dayglored (Listen, strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing
authored by the main governing body for open source and free software

When were they declared to be that? I guess I didn't get the memo.

5 posted on 09/27/2007 8:59:21 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dayglored

We are watching the slow slide into insanity of a person who was once a great programmer. Kind of reminds me of Bobby Fischer.


6 posted on 09/27/2007 9:10:09 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Halfmanhalfamazing

Now if everyone who uses Stallman’s software and licenses would start trying to replace them like BSD does he might actually be completely mitigated, although I don’t see anyone else actually working to do that.


7 posted on 09/27/2007 9:54:46 AM PDT by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle
Now if everyone who uses Stallman’s software and licenses would start trying to replace them like BSD

Some developers might not want to release their code into the wiled without and compensation..

8 posted on 09/27/2007 9:58:06 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Golden Eagle

The licence isn’t as important as the software itself.


9 posted on 09/27/2007 6:55:25 PM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing (Thompson, Hunter, Tancredo, Paul. In that order. The rest seem dishonest to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson