Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm sorry, but...
09/18/2007 | Philistone

Posted on 09/18/2007 9:39:52 AM PDT by Philistone

I'm sorry that your child was killed by a drunk driver, but that doesn't give you the right to pull my car over at random and search me or it.

I'm sorry that your father died of lung cancer at the age of 60, but that doesn't give you the right to tell me I can't smoke in my own house or car.

I'm sorry that your best friend died of a heart-attack after eating nothing but Big Macs all his life, but that doesn't give you the right to tell me that I can't eat fats if I want to.

I'm sorry that you were raised to be squeamish at the sight of blood, but that does not give you the right to force me to eat only vegetables or wear only plant fibers.

I'm sorry that you can't afford health insurance, but that does not give you the right to force me to provide it for you.

I'm sorry that over 150 years ago people with the same color skin as me enslaved people with the same color skin as you, but that doesn't give you the right take the hard-earned efforts of my labor for yourself.

I'm sorry that your homeland is corrupt and your culture has no work ethic, but that doesn't give you the right to come here illegally and burden our schools and emergency rooms with your presence.

I'm sorry that your parents chose to come here illegally, but that doesn't give you the right to force me to fund your college education.

I'm sorry that you find it fashionable to ride your bike to work, but that doesn't give you the right to take away my car.

I'm sorry that your lack of intelligence and attention through high school and college left you fit only for a job as a public school teacher, but that doesn't give you the right to inflict your anger and ideology on my child.

I'm sorry that you are mentally and physically unfit to serve in our nation's Armed Forces, but that does not give you the right to disparage those who are fit and do serve.

I'm sorry that your parents and teachers continually told you that you are unique and special, but you are not.

I'm sorry that the jocks stuffed you in your locker in high school, but that doesn't give you the right to equate my President with Hitler.

I'm sorry that you failed Trigonometry, but that doesn't give you the right to equate Sociology with Engineering

I'm sorry that you are not as attractive as other women, but that does not give you the right to impose your feminist idiocracy on me, my company or my family.

I'm sorry that your nervous system is so exquisitely sensitive that you can be hurt by minute variations in air pressure caused by sound waves, but that doesn't give you the right to determine what I can and can not say.

I'm sorry that your enormous ego coupled with a complete lack of self-esteem, lack of any sense of self-worth and ignorance about how the real world works has led you to becoming a Liberal, but... Well, no buts. I'm not really sorry.

Remember: Anyone who tells you "it's for the children" believes that YOU are a child.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: imsorrysosorry; plzacceptmyapology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-350 next last
To: sure_fine

The other one is “if it saves just one life...”.

If Hillary wins, we will have the government telling us what we can eat, how many miles a day we have to jog, how often we have to have check-ups (The Silky Pony said last week that if gov’t was paying for health care then it had a right to tell people how they should remain healthy), etc, etc.

My own attitude is that you could live twice as long if you gave up everything that would make you want to.


61 posted on 09/18/2007 10:13:54 AM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dominick

Oh, thank you. I’m so sick of the “privilege” nonsense.

I always have to ask, “Did people in the 1800s have to have licenses to drive or ride a horse?” Apparently, it wasn’t just a “privilege”.


62 posted on 09/18/2007 10:14:10 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Philistone

I’ll also add similar to 1st:

I’m sorry that your child was killed on the highway, but that doesn’t give you the right to pull my car over because you don’t see a seat belt over my chest.


63 posted on 09/18/2007 10:15:36 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
The courts have said otherwise, repeatedly.

The courts are wrong. But this is not a surprise; the government already engages in a great deal of unconstitutional activity already.
64 posted on 09/18/2007 10:16:34 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Philistone

The Fresno Police Department routinely conducts sobriety checkpoints. Sometimes they have great success and arrest about five people for DUI. But regardless of the numbers, they always seize a lot of vehicles from unlicensed drivers. That is not a bad thing per se, as they get a LOT of revenue from impound fees. It’s not about safety really, it’s about the money.


65 posted on 09/18/2007 10:17:25 AM PDT by Enterprise (Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
‘Sorry but you are wrong, when it’s a random stop with no probable cause it’s wrong.’

In your opinion. In the real world, its law thats been affirmed repeatedly

Sorry, Badeye, you are mistaken.

The SCOTUS has ruled that random stops are unreasonable. (DELAWARE v. PROUSE, 440 U.S. 648 (1979) They allow for formal road blocks where all drivers are checked but not for officers randomly stopping automobiles without probable cause in order to search and/or question the driver.

66 posted on 09/18/2007 10:17:39 AM PDT by tx_eggman (ManBearPig '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Random searches are UNREASONABLE, regardless of circumstance.

I suppose you support the ludicrous random searches at the airports, too, when we all know the most likely terror perpetrators are young arab-type males.


67 posted on 09/18/2007 10:17:55 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

I was referring more to the keyboard commandoes who think that the Armed Forces just take anyone who walks through the door.

I’ve actually known three guys who decided “Heck, I can’t find a job so I’ll join the Army.” All three were back after washing out of boot camp.


68 posted on 09/18/2007 10:18:37 AM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

‘Drunk driving deaths are too many at any level. But so are murders. Each should be subject to law enforcement action and judicial sanctions without subjecting everyone else to unreasonable detentions and searches.’

I think drunk drivers that kill innocent people are in fact ‘murderers’ especially when its not the first time they’ve been busted driving drunk.

To some, this is a debate about legal theory. To some, like myself, its an absurd notion that can’t hold up in any court in the United States, for the obvious reason.

My friend was 22 years old, recently married, with a six month old little girl. His wife had just got up off the couch, my friend was also about to go to bed, but he wanted to see the baseball scores - it was a Friday evening at 11:26PM. So his wife picked their little daugher up off the couch, walked to the bedroom door...and watched a Trans Am driven by a 19 year old with a previous conviction for DUI come through the window and kill him. Ten seconds sooner, it would have been a triple burial (narrow basement apartment on Ridge Avenue in Cincinnati).

You won’t convince me this isn’t a ‘reasonable search’, nor will you convince me the courts have made a mistake on this one.

Sorry. I understand what you are saying...I just can’t agree with you. I’ve seen the wreckage after this kind of theory is applied in the real world too many times, way to personally.


69 posted on 09/18/2007 10:19:37 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
In the real world, its law thats been affirmed repeatedly.

Just because some black robe approved it, doesn't make it constitutional. Judges are like politicians, which are like dirty diapers; they should be changed often. When a judge makes a ruling that lines up with the Constitution, give him a pat on the back. When he makes one against the Constitution (and these rulings in question are definitely against the Constitution) then put him in his place.

Approval by a black robe does not convey legitimacy.
70 posted on 09/18/2007 10:20:29 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Badeye; Philistone; JamesP81

Phil, that’s a fine rant but Badeye is correct about the driving. Like owning a home, owning a car and driving it within the limits of the law is a privilege.


71 posted on 09/18/2007 10:20:32 AM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Borges

You are correct about that. No need to imply they’re dumb or ignorant (although I’d argue that with the “elementary” types who have nothing but “Education” education).

Many teachers are very bright, and many don’t even subscribe to their masters in the forced unions.


72 posted on 09/18/2007 10:20:35 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
And I would never, ever post anything just for the thrill of watching the fireworks! ;-)
73 posted on 09/18/2007 10:21:03 AM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
A troll? Since 2000?

It wouldn't be the first time.
74 posted on 09/18/2007 10:22:04 AM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: the OlLine Rebel

I may have laid that one on a bit thick, but I am sick of teachers who can’t even pass the tests that they give their students yet think that their opinions on world affairs are Gospel.


75 posted on 09/18/2007 10:23:08 AM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

Murderers also kill a lot of innocent people. But I too have had a friend killed by a drunk driver and I am truly sympathetic with you for the loss of your friend, but I don’t want that being used as an excuse to stop me without just or probable cause. I resent it and I wish the courts would stop it.


76 posted on 09/18/2007 10:23:40 AM PDT by Enterprise (Those who "betray us" also "Betray U.S." They're called DEMOCRATS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

The courts have said otherwise, repeatedly.

The courts are wrong. But this is not a surprise; the government already engages in a great deal of unconstitutional activity already.

I understand your opinion. I wouldn’t offer that up to a cop that pulls you over, however....(chuckle)


77 posted on 09/18/2007 10:24:56 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

Yes. “For the children” includes keeping them away from their mommies when they’re sick by strapping them in the back seat of a car, so mommy can’t help them while their tummies are pushed in when they want to vomit enough already; and not letting them feel the freedom and ecstasy of an unencumbered bike ride. Amongst other myriad things. Glad I grew up in the last gasp of freedom for kids.


78 posted on 09/18/2007 10:25:29 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise

I think its about both money and limiting the number of idiot drunk drivers on the highways.


79 posted on 09/18/2007 10:25:40 AM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
This thread is hilariously typical of FReeperdom — everybody’s arguing over the FIRST LINE!

LOL. I agree, but it makes for an entertaining read!
80 posted on 09/18/2007 10:25:49 AM PDT by khnyny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson