Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I'm sorry, but...
09/18/2007 | Philistone

Posted on 09/18/2007 9:39:52 AM PDT by Philistone

I'm sorry that your child was killed by a drunk driver, but that doesn't give you the right to pull my car over at random and search me or it.

I'm sorry that your father died of lung cancer at the age of 60, but that doesn't give you the right to tell me I can't smoke in my own house or car.

I'm sorry that your best friend died of a heart-attack after eating nothing but Big Macs all his life, but that doesn't give you the right to tell me that I can't eat fats if I want to.

I'm sorry that you were raised to be squeamish at the sight of blood, but that does not give you the right to force me to eat only vegetables or wear only plant fibers.

I'm sorry that you can't afford health insurance, but that does not give you the right to force me to provide it for you.

I'm sorry that over 150 years ago people with the same color skin as me enslaved people with the same color skin as you, but that doesn't give you the right take the hard-earned efforts of my labor for yourself.

I'm sorry that your homeland is corrupt and your culture has no work ethic, but that doesn't give you the right to come here illegally and burden our schools and emergency rooms with your presence.

I'm sorry that your parents chose to come here illegally, but that doesn't give you the right to force me to fund your college education.

I'm sorry that you find it fashionable to ride your bike to work, but that doesn't give you the right to take away my car.

I'm sorry that your lack of intelligence and attention through high school and college left you fit only for a job as a public school teacher, but that doesn't give you the right to inflict your anger and ideology on my child.

I'm sorry that you are mentally and physically unfit to serve in our nation's Armed Forces, but that does not give you the right to disparage those who are fit and do serve.

I'm sorry that your parents and teachers continually told you that you are unique and special, but you are not.

I'm sorry that the jocks stuffed you in your locker in high school, but that doesn't give you the right to equate my President with Hitler.

I'm sorry that you failed Trigonometry, but that doesn't give you the right to equate Sociology with Engineering

I'm sorry that you are not as attractive as other women, but that does not give you the right to impose your feminist idiocracy on me, my company or my family.

I'm sorry that your nervous system is so exquisitely sensitive that you can be hurt by minute variations in air pressure caused by sound waves, but that doesn't give you the right to determine what I can and can not say.

I'm sorry that your enormous ego coupled with a complete lack of self-esteem, lack of any sense of self-worth and ignorance about how the real world works has led you to becoming a Liberal, but... Well, no buts. I'm not really sorry.

Remember: Anyone who tells you "it's for the children" believes that YOU are a child.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: imsorrysosorry; plzacceptmyapology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-350 next last
To: Badeye
‘We’ haven’t. And if that was true (muckraker) tell the forum why there will be DUI checkpoints come Friday night in your town?

It is true (statist) and there will be DUI checkpoints everywhere Friday night because the American people have turned into a bunch of sheep and the governmental entities need more revenue.

181 posted on 09/18/2007 12:14:10 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Philistone

Most states’ law requires a driver’s license, valid vehicle license and registration, and proof of insurance.

Checking for valid documentation is not the same as checking for impairment.

I don’t like checkpoint stops but also cannot see anything Constitutionally that prohibits them.


182 posted on 09/18/2007 12:14:26 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agree with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

It is true (statist) and there will be DUI checkpoints everywhere Friday night because the American people have turned into a bunch of sheep and the governmental entities need more revenue.

I think it has more to do with driving drunk no longer being a laughing matter, and the fact that the number of dead each year is measured in the thousands, with the injured measured in six digits.

But no matter, there will be checkpoints, as you noted.


183 posted on 09/18/2007 12:19:44 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Eagle Eye

Some states also have laws requiring handguns to be stored unloaded in a locked box if children are present in the household.

Doesn’t give cops the right to enter your house at will to determine whether or not you are complying.

You don’t void the presumption of innocence or the 4th Amendment just because you turn the key in your ignition.


184 posted on 09/18/2007 12:22:47 PM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Okay, prove its ‘factually incorrect’. I’ll wait.

DUI Hysteria Frustrates the People

BIG BROTHER'S NEW PROHIBITION by Stephen Beck

Legalize Drunk Driving

185 posted on 09/18/2007 12:23:52 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
There were 16,885 alcohol-related fatalities in 2005 – 39 percent of the total traffic fatalities for the year.

Do you have any idea what "alcohol-related" means?

I do, and so do many other people on this forum.

186 posted on 09/18/2007 12:25:32 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
I think it has more to do with driving drunk no longer being a laughing matter, and the fact that the number of dead each year is measured in the thousands........
187 posted on 09/18/2007 12:28:08 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
I think it has more to do with driving drunk no longer being a laughing matter, and the fact that the number of dead each year is measured in the thousands........

You really need to stop spreading this lie.

188 posted on 09/18/2007 12:28:49 PM PDT by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

If you read what I posted, you would see the definition, and the explanation as it relates to the numbers contained therein.

Sorry, thousands die each year as a direct result of DUI in this country.

Yep, you can split a hair here if you wish, but the article I cited from proves my point conclusively.


189 posted on 09/18/2007 12:29:38 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: elkfersupper

‘You really need to stop spreading this lie.’

you aren’t worth a lie to me.

Don’t post that insult towards me, thanks in advance.


190 posted on 09/18/2007 12:31:27 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Philistone

4A prohibits unreasonable searches, not all searches.

And yes, that could be subjecive.


191 posted on 09/18/2007 12:36:45 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (If you agree with Democrats you agree with America's enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Badeye; Froufrou
Its my understanding our rights are clearly spelled out, in quite a bit of detail come to think of it.

You're understanding is quite incorrect. The Constitution's listing of our rights is not exhaustive. Amendment IX: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The list of rights in the Constitution does not constitute ALL rights retained by the people. There are others besides them. Furthermore, the Constitution primarily is not to tell us what our rights are, but to tell the government what it is permitted to do.
192 posted on 09/18/2007 12:38:31 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Nationwide in 2005, alcohol was present in 24 percent of the drivers involved in fatal crashes (BAC .01-.07, 4 percent; BAC .08 or greater, 20 percent).

In other words, 76% of drivers involved in fatal accidents had NO alcohol and 80% (4 out of 5) had lower than the .08% BAC which is the current level for a per se DUI.

Sure justifies tossing presumption of innocence and the 4th Amendment out the window.

The 16,885 alcohol-related fatalities in 2005 (39% of total traffic fatalities for the year)

If you look closely at the juxtaposition of these two paragraphs, it is clear that a whopping 15% of "alcohol related" fatalities involve someone who was NOT a driver. But these are the statistics people point to when they say "there oughta be a law!"

193 posted on 09/18/2007 12:41:08 PM PDT by Philistone (Your existence as a non-believer offends the Prophet(MPBUH).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

Okay.

When you moving? And to where?

Just wonderin’...


194 posted on 09/18/2007 12:41:27 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Philistone

Okay.


195 posted on 09/18/2007 12:42:28 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

“...tell the government what it is permitted to do.”

Ruh-roh, I think someone forgot about that!

Just as Liberals act like the Constitution is Maslowe’s Hierarchy of Needs...


196 posted on 09/18/2007 12:42:51 PM PDT by Froufrou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Be sure to cite that during a dui stop, if you get into one. And ping me with the response the ST’s or county boys and girls give you....

You seem to think LEOs going around ignoring the Constitution is funny. I don't find anything humorous about it myself.
197 posted on 09/18/2007 12:50:06 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81

No, I just know what happens when you try to play that long time honored game ‘cite the Constitution to a trooper!’

(chuckle)

Enjoy your evening, I appreciated your insights on this.


198 posted on 09/18/2007 12:54:02 PM PDT by Badeye (You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Badeye
Okay. When you moving? And to where? Just wonderin’...

I'm not the one that's advocating tossing out the American ideal of civil liberties here. You'll be the one to be moving out. Probably to somewhere a bit more...statist. Belgium, perhaps.
199 posted on 09/18/2007 12:54:17 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; Abram; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; Allosaurs_r_us; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
200 posted on 09/18/2007 12:56:59 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 341-350 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson