One problem is much of our entertainment and fashion industry is gay men. Who view androgynous shapes as sexier. Which imo is anti-fertility. Women dont’ want to allegedly wreck their figure by having more children.
In some ancient cultures a pregnant woman was viewed as a sex symbol of fertility.
I agree about that underwear.. I saw a video of Britney on youtube and she was in sweat pants, and a wool hat and t-shirt.. and imo she looked great. I was like wow I didn’t realize she was that good looking. Somehow the way they dress her and do her up seems to take away from her natural sexiness to me.
I agree 110%!! As a healthy heterosexual male I look at so many of the “Twiggy” females in fashion magazines and wonder what is the appeal?? Even if it were not terribly unhealthy for these girls and women, reason enough to put a stop to it of course, it’s also completely unappealing to most semi-’normal’ males..... The skin-and-bones androgynous look certainly doesn’t appeal to me! Then I read and hear about the extent to which gay males dominate the sensibility of a large portion of the fashion industry and it all fits — they want stick-like women who look like teenage boys!
Agreed. When I was younger, an undressed or under-dressed female was something rare and highly desirable. Now, I find this sort of tawdry display something between tasteless and boring.
If they're going to dress "sexy", I think a really pretty outfit does wonders that a bra and panties can't touch. A bikini is nice, but inappropriate to a dance number. Lingerie belongs in the bedroom, not on the performance stage.