UPDATE
This moring on the Today Show Matt Lauer interviewed this girl about her experience. She was wearing the same outfit as on the plane. Lauer asked her to stand up so that everyone could see the outfit and decide for themselves if it was too revealing. He didn;t think so.
However, when she went to sit back down she flashed the viewing audience a crotch shot featuring silky white panties.
The video will probably be on youtube within hours, but suffice to say, I think her lawsuit dreams are over.
Gotta love live TV.
We have a trash culture and girls are raised to be sluts. Boys are raised to be thugs. I hope I see a culture change before I die — a new Victorian Age would be a very good thing.
Anyone that dresses the way she does is doing so to be noticed. That is her sole reason and nothing else. She can howl all she wants; but if she wants to be treated decently then dress decently.
I suspect “Keith” couldn’t stand the competition for the attention of the men on the flight...
Bitch!
Pictures! We need pictures if we’re to judge this outbreak of lewdness for ourselves. :smirk:
By the way, "Silky White Panties" is a good band name.
My daughter is young, tall, blond and beautiful, Michele Ebbert told me, and she is both envied and complimented on her appearance. She dresses provocatively, as do 99 percent of 23-year-old girls who can. But they were out of line.
I think the Mother raised her daughter to dress and act like a hoe. And Lady, 5 Foot 5 is not tall.
________________________________________________________
Even her mother thinks she dresses provocatively that says alot. I love her excuse, because 99% dress that way. Geez why are moms allowing their daughters to dress like tramps with no modesty? Do they enjoy the thought of men of all ages regardless of marital status looking at them?
Well, I see she’s making the most of her 15 minutes of fame. How long before she shows up in Playboy?
And she's workin' it at Hooters. Mom sounds quite proud of that. Where's Dad?
Sam: "Yea, what's that"?
Woody: "Let's date them".
“However, when she went to sit back down she flashed the viewing audience a crotch shot featuring silky white panties. “
Who sits in front of you in a plane?
I would rather see her on a plane than the teens wearing pajamas with filthy hair or the fat hoochie mamas in their tight Juicy track suits.
It was 106 degrees. I have no problem with an unmarried girl dressing like this when the temperature is that high. She is showing no cleavage, no shoulders, no boobage, just a length of leg. This is the prerogative of youth, fitness, and beauty. Mature men ought to be able to tolerate the sight of a pair of legs without going crazy with lust, and women ought to be able to tolerate the same sight without going crazy with jealousy and hostility.
I don’t know about you, but one of my big gripes with the airlines is that they just don’t take the time to dispense fashion advice any more.
** To think I felt self conscious wearing jeans one time on the airplane. I don’t recall what I wore for my honeymoon but I think it was a business casual two piece. It’s not the airline’s job to dispense any advice. It’s a person’s personal responsibility to dress in such a way that respects the people around them.
Most ludicrous thing I have heard today. Was Keith fired? Who has his side of the story, not that I hold much credence?
Shame on NBC Today Show. When interviewed by Matt Lauer, Kyla, in front of her lawyer of course indicated that she was chastised in front of many of the passengers, all facing front and toward the door of course. But the article indicated the discussion was on the jet bridge. Now I know ratings AND sensationalism go hand in hand but let’s not get just as ludicrous as the story itself.
Bottom line: Shame on Southwest Airlines. Miscommunication, poor judgment, Keith woke up on the wrong side of the bed, whatever. Shame on NBC Today Show. Sensationalism, poor judgment, Kyla woke up with $$$ ringing in her head, whatever.
They got cameras in the backs of plane seats now?
I wonder if she was possibly traveling “non-rev” .. in other words on an employee pass of some sort...
I know when I worked for American Airlines anyone traveling on an employee pass had a dress code. One of the dress codes back then was women had to have hose on if they were traveling in a dress. I saw a woman denied boarding in Boston based on that .. she was in a very short dress and no hose. She was angry - but from the conversation she also worked at the Boston Airport and she knew the rules... I didn’t feel sorry for her. Rules are rules ...
NOW - if the girl in the post above was a paying passenger .. sleazy looks aside I think she should have been allowed to board.
Somehow I don’t think the whole story is being revealed.